BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30297085)

  • 1. Efficient Neural Coding in Auditory and Speech Perception.
    Gervain J; Geffen MN
    Trends Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 42(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 30297085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.
    Swaminathan J; Heinz MG
    J Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 32(5):1747-56. PubMed ID: 22302814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnified Neural Envelope Coding Predicts Deficits in Speech Perception in Noise.
    Millman RE; Mattys SL; Gouws AD; Prendergast G
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7727-7736. PubMed ID: 28694336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing of modulation in sounds.
    Kay RH
    Physiol Rev; 1982 Jul; 62(3):894-975. PubMed ID: 7045902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory processing--speech, space and auditory objects.
    Scott SK
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2005 Apr; 15(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 15831402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decoding Articulatory Features from fMRI Responses in Dorsal Speech Regions.
    Correia JM; Jansma BM; Bonte M
    J Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 35(45):15015-25. PubMed ID: 26558773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient auditory coding.
    Smith EC; Lewicki MS
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7079):978-82. PubMed ID: 16495999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A neural population selective for song in human auditory cortex.
    Norman-Haignere SV; Feather J; Boebinger D; Brunner P; Ritaccio A; McDermott JH; Schalk G; Kanwisher N
    Curr Biol; 2022 Apr; 32(7):1470-1484.e12. PubMed ID: 35196507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.
    Heinz MG; Swaminathan J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 10(3):407-23. PubMed ID: 19365691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization.
    Carter JA; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2021 May; 1759():147385. PubMed ID: 33631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound.
    Oxenham AJ
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2018 Jan; 69():27-50. PubMed ID: 29035691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the anatomical encoding of voice with a mathematical model of the vocal system.
    Assaneo MF; Sitt J; Varoquaux G; Sigman M; Cohen L; Trevisan MA
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 141():31-39. PubMed ID: 27436593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of afferent impulse activity at various levels of the auditory pathway of rats during the action of sound signals.
    Vartanyan IA
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 1978; 9(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 748829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on temporal coding of narrowband and broadband signals in the auditory periphery.
    Henry KS; Heinz MG
    Hear Res; 2013 Sep; 303():39-47. PubMed ID: 23376018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Representation of temporal sound features in the human auditory cortex.
    Nourski KV; Brugge JF
    Rev Neurosci; 2011; 22(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 21476940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Reveal an Efficient Auditory Efferent Network.
    Marian V; Lam TQ; Hayakawa S; Dhar S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 61(11):2827-2832. PubMed ID: 30458524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention fine-tunes auditory-motor processing of speech sounds.
    Möttönen R; van de Ven GM; Watkins KE
    J Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 34(11):4064-9. PubMed ID: 24623783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of noise and cue enhancement on neural responses to speech in auditory midbrain, thalamus and cortex.
    Cunningham J; Nicol T; King C; Zecker SG; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2002 Jul; 169(1-2):97-111. PubMed ID: 12121743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.
    Zaehle T; Wüstenberg T; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2447-56. PubMed ID: 15525285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physiologic acoustic basis of speech perception.
    Angelo R
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1985 May; 18(2):285-303. PubMed ID: 2989756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.