BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30297167)

  • 1. Handling of Missing Outcome Data in Acute Stroke Trials: Advantages of Multiple Imputation Using Baseline and Postbaseline Variables.
    Young-Saver DF; Gornbein J; Starkman S; Saver JL
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Dec; 27(12):3662-3669. PubMed ID: 30297167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Day-90 acute ischemic stroke outcomes can be derived from early functional activity level.
    Ovbiagele B; Saver JL
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2010; 29(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 19893312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Missing outcome data management in acute stroke trials testing iv thrombolytics. Is there risk of bias?
    Fernandez-Ferro J; Schwamm LH; Descalzo MA; MacIsaac R; Lyden PD; Lees KR
    Eur Stroke J; 2020 Jun; 5(2):148-154. PubMed ID: 32637648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of results from different imputation techniques for missing data from an anti-obesity drug trial.
    Jørgensen AW; Lundstrøm LH; Wetterslev J; Astrup A; Gøtzsche PC
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111964. PubMed ID: 25409438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consequences of handling missing data for treatment response in osteoarthritis: a simulation study.
    Olsen IC; Kvien TK; Uhlig T
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2012 Aug; 20(8):822-8. PubMed ID: 22441031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review of outcome after ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation occlusion treated with intravenous, intra-arterial, or combined intravenous+intra-arterial thrombolysis.
    Mullen MT; Pisapia JM; Tilwa S; Messé SR; Stein SC
    Stroke; 2012 Sep; 43(9):2350-5. PubMed ID: 22811451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias and Precision of the "Multiple Imputation, Then Deletion" Method for Dealing With Missing Outcome Data.
    Sullivan TR; Salter AB; Ryan P; Lee KJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 182(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 26337075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imputation strategies when a continuous outcome is to be dichotomized for responder analysis: a simulation study.
    Floden L; Bell ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):161. PubMed ID: 31345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Solitaire™ with the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke (SWIFT PRIME) trial: protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study comparing the Solitaire revascularization device with IV tPA with IV tPA alone in acute ischemic stroke.
    Saver JL; Goyal M; Bonafe A; Diener HC; Levy EI; Pereira VM; Albers GW; Cognard C; Cohen DJ; Hacke W; Jansen O; Jovin TG; Mattle HP; Nogueira RG; Siddiqui AH; Yavagal DR; Devlin TG; Lopes DK; Reddy V; du Mesnil de Rochemont R; Jahan R;
    Int J Stroke; 2015 Apr; 10(3):439-48. PubMed ID: 25777831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.
    Rombach I; Gray AM; Jenkinson C; Murray DW; Rivero-Arias O
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):87. PubMed ID: 30153796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
    Mukaka M; White SA; Terlouw DJ; Mwapasa V; Kalilani-Phiri L; Faragher EB
    Trials; 2016 Jul; 17():341. PubMed ID: 27450066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shift analysis versus dichotomization of the modified Rankin scale outcome scores in the NINDS and ECASS-II trials.
    Savitz SI; Lew R; Bluhmki E; Hacke W; Fisher M
    Stroke; 2007 Dec; 38(12):3205-12. PubMed ID: 17975102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative analyses for handling incomplete follow-up in the intention-to-treat analysis: the randomized controlled trial of balloon kyphoplasty versus non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE).
    Ranstam J; Turkiewicz A; Boonen S; Van Meirhaeghe J; Bastian L; Wardlaw D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Mar; 12():35. PubMed ID: 22443312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Missing Data in Alcohol Clinical Trials with Binary Outcomes.
    Hallgren KA; Witkiewitz K; Kranzler HR; Falk DE; Litten RZ; O'Malley SS; Anton RF;
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2016 Jul; 40(7):1548-57. PubMed ID: 27254113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Missing data in randomized controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis with radiographic outcomes: a simulation study.
    Baron G; Ravaud P; Samson A; Giraudeau B
    Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Jan; 59(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 18163406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator plus eptifibatide versus recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator alone in acute ischemic stroke: propensity score-matched post hoc analysis.
    Adeoye O; Sucharew H; Khoury J; Tomsick T; Khatri P; Palesch Y; Schmit PA; Pancioli AM; Broderick JP;
    Stroke; 2015 Feb; 46(2):461-4. PubMed ID: 25523054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analyses that use data from hierarchical studies: an application to cluster randomized trials.
    Gomes M; Díaz-Ordaz K; Grieve R; Kenward MG
    Med Decis Making; 2013 Nov; 33(8):1051-63. PubMed ID: 23913915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
    Higashida RT; Furlan AJ; Roberts H; Tomsick T; Connors B; Barr J; Dillon W; Warach S; Broderick J; Tilley B; Sacks D; ;
    Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):e109-37. PubMed ID: 12869717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - a practical guide with flowcharts.
    Jakobsen JC; Gluud C; Wetterslev J; Winkel P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):162. PubMed ID: 29207961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.