62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30297301)
1. Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update.
Fuller MS; Lee CI; Elmore JG
Med Clin North Am; 2015 May; 99(3):451-68. PubMed ID: 25841594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can you un-ring the bell? A qualitative study of how affect influences cancer screening decisions.
Driedger SM; Annable G; Brouwers M; Turner D; Maier R
BMC Cancer; 2017 Sep; 17(1):647. PubMed ID: 28903742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Overdetection in breast cancer screening: development and preliminary evaluation of a decision aid.
Hersch J; Jansen J; Barratt A; Irwig L; Houssami N; Jacklyn G; Thornton H; Dhillon H; McCaffery K
BMJ Open; 2014 Sep; 4(9):e006016. PubMed ID: 25256188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scrutinizing screening: a critical interpretive review of primary care provider perspectives on mammography decision-making with average-risk women.
Siedlikowski S; Ells C; Bartlett G
Public Health Rev; 2018; 39():15. PubMed ID: 29876139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed Choice in the German Mammography Screening Program by Education and Migrant Status: Survey among First-Time Invitees.
Berens EM; Reder M; Razum O; Kolip P; Spallek J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142316. PubMed ID: 26529513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RE: Informing women about overdetection in breast cancer screening: Two-year outcomes from a randomized trial.
Kraut R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2023 Jan; 115(1):112-113. PubMed ID: 36331345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Layperson Views about the Design and Evaluation of Decision Aids: A Public Deliberation.
Schwartz PH; O'Doherty KC; Bentley C; Schmidt KK; Burgess MM
Med Decis Making; 2021 Jul; 41(5):527-539. PubMed ID: 33813928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed decision making about predictive DNA tests: arguments for more public visibility of personal deliberations about the good life.
Boenink M; van der Burg S
Med Health Care Philos; 2010 May; 13(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 19876767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Common methods of measuring 'informed choice' in screening participation: Challenges and future directions.
Ghanouni A; Renzi C; Meisel SF; Waller J
Prev Med Rep; 2016 Dec; 4():601-607. PubMed ID: 27843761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed decision-making and breast cancer screening.
Sasieni PD; Smith RA; Duffy SW
J Med Screen; 2015 Dec; 22(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 26018778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review update to inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Pillay J; Guitard S; Rahman S; Saba S; Rahman A; Bialy L; Gehring N; Tan M; Melton A; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2024 May; 13(1):140. PubMed ID: 38807191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. IMPAACT: IMproving the PArticipAtion of older people in policy decision-making on common health CondiTions - a study protocol.
Ambagtsheer RC; Hurley CJ; Lawless M; Braunack-Mayer A; Visvanathan R; Beilby J; Stewart S; Cornell V; Leach MJ; Taylor D; Thompson M; Dent E; Whiteway L; Archibald M; O'Rourke HM; Williams K; Chudecka A
BMJ Open; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e075501. PubMed ID: 38216190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using a Deliberative Poll on breast cancer screening to assess and improve the decision quality of laypeople.
Jensen MD; Hansen KM; Siersma V; Brodersen J
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258869. PubMed ID: 34673826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Putting the Patient First: A Scoping Review of Patient Desires in Canada.
Peckham A; Wright JG; Marani H; Abdelhalim R; Laxer D; Allin S; Alam N; Marchildon G
Healthc Policy; 2021 May; 16(4):46-69. PubMed ID: 34129478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards an Explanation of the Social Value of Health Systems: An Interpretive Synthesis.
Whyle EB; Olivier J
Int J Health Policy Manag; 2021 Jul; 10(7):414-429. PubMed ID: 32861236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Codesigning care improvements for women living with HIV: a patient-oriented deliberative dialogue workshop in Montréal, Quebec.
O'Brien N; Law S; Proulx-Boucher K; Ménard B; Skerritt L; Boucoiran I; Cox J; Andersson N; de Pokomandy A
CMAJ Open; 2020; 8(2):E264-E272. PubMed ID: 32303519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Supporting women at average risk to make informed decisions about mammography when there is no "right" answer: a qualitative citizen deliberation study.
Tripp L; Abelson J
CMAJ Open; 2019; 7(4):E730-E737. PubMed ID: 31836630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wise guidance and its challenges: the new Canadian recommendations on breast cancer screening.
Korenstein D
CMAJ; 2018 Dec; 190(49):E1432-E1433. PubMed ID: 30530609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 'I just want to be able to make a choice': Results from citizen deliberations about mammography screening in Ontario, Canada.
Abelson J; Tripp L; Sussman J
Health Policy; 2018 Dec; 122(12):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 30297301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
