192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30297555)
1. The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.
Al-Asadi JN; Al-Maliki SK; Al-Dahhhan F; Al-Naama L; Suood F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 30297555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of malignancy index for adnexal masses.
Akdeniz N; Kuyumcuoğlu U; Kale A; Erdemoğlu M; Caca F
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2009; 30(2):178-80. PubMed ID: 19480249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A preliminary study: The sequential use of the risk malignancy index and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Qiu L; Yang F; Luo H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(29):e11536. PubMed ID: 30024542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.
Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of risk of malignancy indices; RMI 1-4 in borderline ovarian tumor.
Yenen MC; Alanbay I; Aktürk E; Ercan CM; Coksuer H; Karaşahin E; Ozan H; Dede M
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 22611957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of malignancy index in preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses.
Ashrafgangooei T; Rezaeezadeh M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1727-30. PubMed ID: 22126553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External validation of the adapted Risk of Malignancy Index incorporating tumor size in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
van den Akker PA; Zusterzeel PL; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Kluivers KB; Massuger LF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):422-5. PubMed ID: 21824712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.
Radosa MP; Vorwergk J; Fitzgerald J; Kaehler C; Schneider U; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Schleußner E
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Aug; 35(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23775448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the predictive performance of risk of malignancy indexes 1-4, HE4 and risk of malignancy algorithm in the triage of adnexal masses.
Hada A; Han LP; Chen Y; Hu QH; Yuan Y; Liu L
J Ovarian Res; 2020 Apr; 13(1):46. PubMed ID: 32334618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of a risk of malignancy index in clinical approaches to adnexal masses.
Simsek HS; Tokmak A; Ozgu E; Doganay M; Danisman N; Erkaya S; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(18):7793-7. PubMed ID: 25292065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective study to evaluate the risk malignancy index and its diagnostic implication in patients with suspected ovarian mass.
Dora SK; Dandapat AB; Pande B; Hota JP
J Ovarian Res; 2017 Aug; 10(1):55. PubMed ID: 28806987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of risk of malignancy index (RMI), CA125, CA 19-9, ultrasound score, and menopausal status in borderline ovarian tumor.
Alanbay I; Akturk E; Coksuer H; Ercan M; Karaşahin E; Dede M; Yenen MC; Ozan H; Baser I
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2012 Jun; 28(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 22122561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should cut-off values of the risk of malignancy index be changed for evaluation of adnexal masses in Asian and Pacific populations?
Yavuzcan A; Caglar M; Ozgu E; Ustun Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Yildiz E; Gungor T; Kumru S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5455-9. PubMed ID: 24175841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An improved risk of malignancy index in diagnosis of adnexal mass.
Wang LM; Song H; Song X; Zhou XB
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Feb; 125(3):533-5. PubMed ID: 22490416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the risk malignancy index diagnostic value in patients with adnexal masses.
Terzić M; Dotlić J; Ladjević IL; Atanacković J; Ladjević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Jul; 68(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 21899180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Risk of Malignancy Index in daily clinical management of adnexal masses.
van den Akker PA; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Kluivers KB; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Massuger LF
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 19959215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
