166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30298253)
1. Normalization of Microbiome Profiling Data.
McMurdie PJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():143-168. PubMed ID: 30298253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Processing a 16S rRNA Sequencing Dataset with the Microbiome Helper Workflow.
Douglas GM; Comeau AM; Langille MGI
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():131-141. PubMed ID: 30298252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metagenome Assembly and Contig Assignment.
Zhang Q
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():179-192. PubMed ID: 30298255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting the Functional Potential of the Microbiome from Marker Genes Using PICRUSt.
Douglas GM; Beiko RG; Langille MGI
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():169-177. PubMed ID: 30298254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High throughput sequencing methods and analysis for microbiome research.
Di Bella JM; Bao Y; Gloor GB; Burton JP; Reid G
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Dec; 95(3):401-14. PubMed ID: 24029734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From RNA-seq to Biological Inference: Using Compositional Data Analysis in Meta-Transcriptomics.
Macklaim JM; Gloor GB
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():193-213. PubMed ID: 30298256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. taxMaps: comprehensive and highly accurate taxonomic classification of short-read data in reasonable time.
Corvelo A; Clarke WE; Robine N; Zody MC
Genome Res; 2018 May; 28(5):751-758. PubMed ID: 29588360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring the diversity of the human microbiota with targeted next-generation sequencing.
Finotello F; Mastrorilli E; Di Camillo B
Brief Bioinform; 2018 Jul; 19(4):679-692. PubMed ID: 28025179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genome Recovery, Functional Profiling, and Taxonomic Classification from Metagenomes.
Albanese D; Donati C
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2242():153-172. PubMed ID: 33961223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. LEMMI: a continuous benchmarking platform for metagenomics classifiers.
Seppey M; Manni M; Zdobnov EM
Genome Res; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1208-1216. PubMed ID: 32616517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What Is Metagenomics Teaching Us, and What Is Missed?
New FN; Brito IL
Annu Rev Microbiol; 2020 Sep; 74():117-135. PubMed ID: 32603623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comprehensive evaluation of the sl1p pipeline for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.
Whelan FJ; Surette MG
Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):100. PubMed ID: 28807046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical considerations for sampling and data analysis in contemporary metagenomics-based environmental studies.
Staley C; Sadowsky MJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Nov; 154():14-18. PubMed ID: 30287354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Different next generation sequencing platforms produce different microbial profiles and diversity in cystic fibrosis sputum.
Hahn A; Sanyal A; Perez GF; Colberg-Poley AM; Campos J; Rose MC; Pérez-Losada M
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():95-99. PubMed ID: 27609714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a Single Locus Sequence Typing (SLST) Scheme for Typing Bacterial Species Directly from Complex Communities.
Scholz CF; Jensen A
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1535():97-107. PubMed ID: 27914075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emerging tools for understanding the human microbiome.
Ghosh TS; Das M
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2022; 191(1):29-51. PubMed ID: 36270681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of a 16S rRNA amplicon Illumina sequencing procedure for studying the microbiome of a symbiont-rich aphid genus.
Jousselin E; Clamens AL; Galan M; Bernard M; Maman S; Gschloessl B; Duport G; Meseguer AS; Calevro F; Coeur d'acier A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 May; 16(3):628-40. PubMed ID: 26458227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A practical guide to amplicon and metagenomic analysis of microbiome data.
Liu YX; Qin Y; Chen T; Lu M; Qian X; Guo X; Bai Y
Protein Cell; 2021 May; 12(5):315-330. PubMed ID: 32394199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
