These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30298254)

  • 1. Predicting the Functional Potential of the Microbiome from Marker Genes Using PICRUSt.
    Douglas GM; Beiko RG; Langille MGI
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():169-177. PubMed ID: 30298254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences.
    Langille MG; Zaneveld J; Caporaso JG; McDonald D; Knights D; Reyes JA; Clemente JC; Burkepile DE; Vega Thurber RL; Knight R; Beiko RG; Huttenhower C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 31(9):814-21. PubMed ID: 23975157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing a 16S rRNA Sequencing Dataset with the Microbiome Helper Workflow.
    Douglas GM; Comeau AM; Langille MGI
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():131-141. PubMed ID: 30298252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normalization of Microbiome Profiling Data.
    McMurdie PJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():143-168. PubMed ID: 30298253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genome-Based Targeted Sequencing as a Reproducible Microbial Community Profiling Assay.
    Benjamino J; Leopold B; Phillips D; Adams MD
    mSphere; 2021 Apr; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 33827913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inference-based accuracy of metagenome prediction tools varies across sample types and functional categories.
    Sun S; Jones RB; Fodor AA
    Microbiome; 2020 Apr; 8(1):46. PubMed ID: 32241293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data.
    Aßhauer KP; Wemheuer B; Daniel R; Meinicke P
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2882-4. PubMed ID: 25957349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 16S rRNA Gene Analysis with QIIME2.
    Hall M; Beiko RG
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():113-129. PubMed ID: 30298251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different next generation sequencing platforms produce different microbial profiles and diversity in cystic fibrosis sputum.
    Hahn A; Sanyal A; Perez GF; Colberg-Poley AM; Campos J; Rose MC; Pérez-Losada M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():95-99. PubMed ID: 27609714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbial community analysis using high-throughput sequencing technology: a beginner's guide for microbiologists.
    Jo J; Oh J; Park C
    J Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(3):176-192. PubMed ID: 32108314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metagenome Assembly and Contig Assignment.
    Zhang Q
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():179-192. PubMed ID: 30298255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marker genes as predictors of shared genomic function.
    Sevigny JL; Rothenheber D; Diaz KS; Zhang Y; Agustsson K; Bergeron RD; Thomas WK
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Apr; 20(1):268. PubMed ID: 30947688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PanFP: pangenome-based functional profiles for microbial communities.
    Jun SR; Robeson MS; Hauser LJ; Schadt CW; Gorin AA
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():479. PubMed ID: 26409790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Expanded Gene Catalog of Mouse Gut Metagenomes.
    Zhu J; Ren H; Zhong H; Li X; Zou Y; Han M; Li M; Madsen L; Kristiansen K; Xiao L
    mSphere; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33627510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
    Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
    Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metagenomic approaches in microbial ecology: an update on whole-genome and marker gene sequencing analyses.
    Pérez-Cobas AE; Gomez-Valero L; Buchrieser C
    Microb Genom; 2020 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 32706331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comprehensive evaluation of the sl1p pipeline for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.
    Whelan FJ; Surette MG
    Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):100. PubMed ID: 28807046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From RNA-seq to Biological Inference: Using Compositional Data Analysis in Meta-Transcriptomics.
    Macklaim JM; Gloor GB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():193-213. PubMed ID: 30298256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using 16S rRNA gene as marker to detect unknown bacteria in microbial communities.
    Tran Q; Pham DT; Phan V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 14):499. PubMed ID: 29297282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MetaGeniE: characterizing human clinical samples using deep metagenomic sequencing.
    Rawat A; Engelthaler DM; Driebe EM; Keim P; Foster JT
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110915. PubMed ID: 25365329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.