709 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30298532)
1. Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis.
Sotiriadis A; Petousis S; Thilaganathan B; Figueras F; Martins WP; Odibo AO; Dinas K; Hyett J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 53(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 30298532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Grobman WA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Hong J; Atkinson J; Roddy Mitchell A; Tong S; Walker SP; Middleton A; Lindquist A; Hastie R
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 May; 6(5):e2313162. PubMed ID: 37171818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review.
Rydahl E; Eriksen L; Juhl M
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Feb; 17(2):170-208. PubMed ID: 30299344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Darney BG; Snowden JM; Cheng YW; Jacob L; Nicholson JM; Kaimal A; Dublin S; Getahun D; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):761-769. PubMed ID: 24084532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical practice?
Wennerholm UB; Hagberg H; Brorsson B; Bergh C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 19140042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
Kawakita T; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fonseca MJ; Santos F; Afreixo V; Silva IS; Almeida MDC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Oct; 253():213-219. PubMed ID: 32889327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Alkmark M; Keulen JKJ; Kortekaas JC; Bergh C; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Hagberg H; Mol BW; Molin M; van der Post JAM; Saltvedt S; Wikström AK; Wennerholm UB; de Miranda E
PLoS Med; 2020 Dec; 17(12):e1003436. PubMed ID: 33290410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Olivier F; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1312-8. PubMed ID: 12798542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question].
Rozenberg P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 May; 46(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 29656952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.
Keulen JK; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Bossuyt PM; Oudijk MA; Duijnhoven RG; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche FP; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
BMJ; 2019 Feb; 364():l344. PubMed ID: 30786997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial.
Glavind J; Kindberg SF; Uldbjerg N; Khalil M; Møller AM; Mortensen BB; Rasmussen OB; Christensen JT; Jørgensen JS; Henriksen TB
BJOG; 2013 Aug; 120(9):1123-32. PubMed ID: 23682628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies.
Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):389.e1-389.e12. PubMed ID: 26440691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of labor at full term in uncomplicated singleton gestations: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
Saccone G; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):629-36. PubMed ID: 25882916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Melamed N; Ray JG; Geary M; Bedard D; Yang C; Sprague A; Murray-Davis B; Barrett J; Berger H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section].
Qu ZQ; Ma RM; Xiao H; Tian YQ; Li BL; Liang K; Du MY; Chen Z; Geng L; Yang MH; Tao YP; Zhu B
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 51(10):748-753. PubMed ID: 27788742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
