184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30298710)
1. Prostate-specific antigen levels and proportion of biopsy positive cores are independent predictors of upgrading patterns in low-risk prostate cancer.
Porcaro AB; Inverardi D; Corsi P; Sebben M; Cacciamani G; Tafuri A; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Mattevi D; De Marchi D; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Cerruto MA; Brunelli M; Siracusano S; Artibani W
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Feb; 72(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 30298710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate-specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL: A predictor of degree of upgrading to ≥8 among patients with biopsy Gleason score 6.
Santok GD; Abdel Raheem A; Kim LH; Chang K; Lum TG; Chung BH; Choi YD; Rha KH
Investig Clin Urol; 2017 Mar; 58(2):90-97. PubMed ID: 28261677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative upgrading of prostate cancer in men ≥75 years: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Herlemann A; Buchner A; Kretschmer A; Apfelbeck M; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Tritschler S
World J Urol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):1517-1524. PubMed ID: 28493044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between Basal Total Testosterone Levels and Tumor Upgrading in Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.
Porcaro AB; De Luyk N; Corsi P; Sebben M; Tafuri A; Processali T; Cerasuolo M; Mattevi D; Cerruto MA; Brunelli M; Siracusano S; Artibani W
Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 28245478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endogenous testosterone density as ratio of endogenous testosterone levels on prostate volume predicts tumor upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer.
Porcaro AB; Gallina S; Bianchi A; Cerrato C; Tafuri A; Rizzetto R; Amigoni N; Orlando R; Serafin E; Gozzo A; Migliorini F; Antoniolli SZ; Lacola V; De Marco V; Brunelli M; Cerruto MA; Siracusano S; Antonelli A
Int Urol Nephrol; 2021 Dec; 53(12):2505-2515. PubMed ID: 34677784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total testosterone density predicts high tumor load and disease reclassification of prostate cancer: results in 144 low-risk patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Shakir A; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Brunelli M; Migliorini F; Siracusano S; Artibani W
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Dec; 51(12):2169-2180. PubMed ID: 31444696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined multiple clinical characteristics for prediction of discordance in grade and stage in prostate cancer patients undergoing systematic biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Liu H; Tang K; Xia D; Peng E; Wang L; Chen Z
Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Nov; 216(11):153235. PubMed ID: 33035728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical factors stratifying the risk of tumor upgrading to high-grade disease in low-risk prostate cancer.
Porcaro AB; Siracusano S; Luyk N; Corsi P; Sebben M; Tafuri A; Processali T; Cerasuolo M; Mattevi D; Inverardi D; Cerruto MA; Brunelli M; Artibani W
Tumori; 2018; 104(2):111-115. PubMed ID: 27791231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The proportion of free PSA and upgrading of biopsy Gleason score after radical prostatectomy.
Visapää H; Hotakainen K; Lundin J; Ala-Opas M; Stenman UH
Urol Int; 2010; 84(4):378-81. PubMed ID: 20299777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Tumor Upgrading to Higher Patterns in the Surgical Specimen. Analysis of Clinical Factors Predicting Tumor Upgrading to Higher Gleason Patterns in a Contemporary Series of Patients Who Have Been Evaluated According to the Modified Gleason Score Grading System.
Porcaro AB; Siracusano S; De Luyk N; Corsi P; Sebben M; Tafuri A; Bizzotto L; Tamanini I; Inverardi D; Cerruto MA; Martignoni G; Brunelli M; Artibani W
Urol Int; 2016; 97(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 26998904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Nezolosky MD; Vastola ME; Labe SA; Boldbaatar N; King MT; Martin NE; Orio PF; Beard CJ; Hoffman KE; Trinh QD; Spratt DE; Feng FY; Nguyen PL
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 28753811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting the risk of harboring high-grade disease for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer scored as Gleason ≤ 6 on biopsy cores.
Seisen T; Roudot-Thoraval F; Bosset PO; Beaugerie A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Salomon L
World J Urol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 24985552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of PSA velocity in predicting pathologic upgrade for Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Krane LS; Menon M; Kaul SA; Siddiqui SA; Wambi C; Peabody JO; Agarwal PK
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 19576796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
