These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30299143)

  • 1. The construct-behavior gap and the description-experience gap: Comment on Regenwetter and Robinson (2017).
    Hertwig R; Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Oct; 125(5):844-849. PubMed ID: 30299143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The construct-behavior gap revisited: Reply to Hertwig and Pleskac (2018).
    Regenwetter M; Robinson MM
    Psychol Rev; 2019 Apr; 126(3):451-454. PubMed ID: 30907621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The construct-behavior gap in behavioral decision research: A challenge beyond replicability.
    Regenwetter M; Robinson MM
    Psychol Rev; 2017 Oct; 124(5):533-550. PubMed ID: 28504522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A meta-analytic review of two modes of learning and the description-experience gap.
    Wulff DU; Mergenthaler-Canseco M; Hertwig R
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Feb; 144(2):140-176. PubMed ID: 29239630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs.
    Brandstätter E; Gigerenzer G; Hertwig R
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Apr; 113(2):409-32. PubMed ID: 16637767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The description-experience gap in risky choice.
    Hertwig R; Erev I
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2009 Dec; 13(12):517-23. PubMed ID: 19836292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of memory in distinguishing risky decisions from experience and description.
    Madan CR; Ludvig EA; Spetch ML
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 27602887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How the twain can meet: Prospect theory and models of heuristics in risky choice.
    Pachur T; Suter RS; Hertwig R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Mar; 93():44-73. PubMed ID: 28189037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noisy preferences in risky choice: A cautionary note.
    Bhatia S; Loomes G
    Psychol Rev; 2017 Oct; 124(5):678-687. PubMed ID: 28569526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice.
    Hertwig R; Barron G; Weber EU; Erev I
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Aug; 15(8):534-9. PubMed ID: 15270998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The description-experience gap in risky choice in nonhuman primates.
    Heilbronner SR; Hayden BY
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):593-600. PubMed ID: 26286883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The probabilistic nature of preferential choice.
    Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1446-65. PubMed ID: 18980407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preference reversals during risk elicitation.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Martin R; Hall L; Johansson P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):585-589. PubMed ID: 31318260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mind the gap? Description, experience, and the continuum of uncertainty in risky choice.
    Camilleri AR; Newell BR
    Prog Brain Res; 2013; 202():55-71. PubMed ID: 23317826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing mixture models of transitive preference: comment on Regenwetter, Dana, and Davis-Stober (2011).
    Birnbaum MH
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Oct; 118(4):675-83; discussion 684-8. PubMed ID: 22003844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How (in)variant are subjective representations of described and experienced risk and rewards?
    Kellen D; Pachur T; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():126-138. PubMed ID: 27620961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experiencing risk: Higher-order risk attitudes in description- and experience-based decisions.
    Becker CK; Ert E; Trautmann ST; van de Kuilen G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 May; 47(5):727-746. PubMed ID: 33180525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From anomalies to forecasts: Toward a descriptive model of decisions under risk, under ambiguity, and from experience.
    Erev I; Ert E; Plonsky O; Cohen D; Cohen O
    Psychol Rev; 2017 Jul; 124(4):369-409. PubMed ID: 28277716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonlinear probability weighting can reflect attentional biases in sequential sampling.
    Zilker V; Pachur T
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Oct; 129(5):949-975. PubMed ID: 34370495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reversed description-experience gap: Disentangling sources of presentation format effects in risky choice.
    Glöckner A; Hilbig BE; Henninger F; Fiedler S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Apr; 145(4):486-508. PubMed ID: 26974209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.