BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30299153)

  • 1. Age-related differences in levels and dynamics of workplace affect.
    Scheibe S; Yeung DY; Doerwald F
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Feb; 34(1):106-123. PubMed ID: 30299153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Higher well-being is related to reduced affective reactivity to positive events in daily life.
    Grosse Rueschkamp JM; Kuppens P; Riediger M; Blanke ES; Brose A
    Emotion; 2020 Apr; 20(3):376-390. PubMed ID: 30550304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of predictors of successful aging in the workplace among Hong Kong Chinese older workers.
    Cheung F; Wu AM
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2012 Mar; 24(3):449-64. PubMed ID: 21996077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Let it be and keep on going! Acceptance and daily occupational well-being in relation to negative work events.
    Kuba K; Scheibe S
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2017 Jan; 22(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 26913611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Control diversity: How across-domain control beliefs are associated with daily negative affect and differ with age.
    Drewelies J; Koffer RE; Ram N; Almeida DM; Gerstorf D
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Aug; 34(5):625-639. PubMed ID: 31192626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-based stereotype threat and work outcomes: Stress appraisals and rumination as mediators.
    von Hippel C; Kalokerinos EK; Haanterä K; Zacher H
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Feb; 34(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 30394772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-differences in work motivation and job satisfaction. The influence of age on the relationships between work characteristics and workers' outcomes.
    Boumans NP; de Jong AH; Janssen SM
    Int J Aging Hum Dev; 2011; 73(4):331-50. PubMed ID: 22474915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A sorrow halved? A daily diary study on talking about experienced workplace incivility and next-morning negative affect.
    Tremmel S; Sonnentag S
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2018 Oct; 23(4):568-583. PubMed ID: 28857597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Life contexts make a difference: emotional stability in younger and older adults.
    Brose A; Scheibe S; Schmiedek F
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Mar; 28(1):148-59. PubMed ID: 23066802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term aging trajectories of the accumulation of disease burden as predictors of daily affect dynamics and stressor reactivity.
    Gerstorf D; Schilling OK; Pauly T; Katzorreck M; Lücke AJ; Wahl HW; Kunzmann U; Hoppmann CA; Ram N
    Psychol Aging; 2023 Dec; 38(8):763-777. PubMed ID: 37824238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sleep duration and affective reactivity to stressors and positive events in daily life.
    Sin NL; Wen JH; Klaiber P; Buxton OM; Almeida DM
    Health Psychol; 2020 Dec; 39(12):1078-1088. PubMed ID: 32897097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of workplace incivility on end-of-work negative affect: examining individual and organizational moderators in a daily diary study.
    Zhou ZE; Yan Y; Che XX; Meier LL
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2015 Jan; 20(1):117-130. PubMed ID: 25347686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of workplace intervention on affective well-being in employees' children.
    Lawson KM; Davis KD; McHale SM; Almeida DM; Kelly EL; King RB
    Dev Psychol; 2016 May; 52(5):772-7. PubMed ID: 26950240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a workplace intervention on daily stressor reactivity.
    Leger KA; Lee S; Chandler KD; Almeida DM
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2022 Feb; 27(1):152-163. PubMed ID: 34472902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age and workers' perceptions of workplace safety: a comparative study.
    Gyekye SA; Salminen S
    Int J Aging Hum Dev; 2009; 68(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 19445348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and Validation of the Workplace Affective Events Survey.
    Devdutt J; Sudhir P; Mehrotra S
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e46236. PubMed ID: 37908908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers: Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
    Phillips JA; Holland MG; Baldwin DD; Gifford-Meuleveld L; Mueller KL; Perkison B; Upfal M; Dreger M
    Workplace Health Saf; 2015 Apr; 63(4):139-64. PubMed ID: 25862727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The affective shift model of work engagement.
    Bledow R; Schmitt A; Frese M; Kühnel J
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Nov; 96(6):1246-57. PubMed ID: 21766997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of job demands and negative work reflection in employees' trajectory of sleep quality over the workweek.
    Haun VC; Oppenauer V
    J Occup Health Psychol; 2019 Dec; 24(6):675-688. PubMed ID: 31070390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does Visual Aesthetics of the Workplace Matter? Analyzing the Assessment of Visual Aesthetics as Antecedent of Affective Commitment and Job Crafting.
    González-Suhr C; Salgado S; Elgueta H; Alcover CM
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Oct; 22():E38. PubMed ID: 31625502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.