These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30300377)

  • 1. Surgical resection for rectal cancer. Is laparoscopic surgery as successful as open approach? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Milone M; Manigrasso M; Burati M; Velotti N; Milone F; De Palma GD
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204887. PubMed ID: 30300377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pathologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Martínez-Pérez A; Carra MC; Brunetti F; de'Angelis N
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):e165665. PubMed ID: 28196217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of classic randomized controlled trials and high-quality Nonrandomized Studies in the last 5 years.
    Chen K; Cao G; Chen B; Wang M; Xu X; Cai W; Xu Y; Xiong M
    Int J Surg; 2017 Mar; 39():1-10. PubMed ID: 28087370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical approach on the grade of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer.
    Creavin B; Kelly ME; Ryan E; Winter DC
    Br J Surg; 2017 Nov; 104(12):1609-1619. PubMed ID: 29044484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes.
    Pędziwiatr M; Małczak P; Mizera M; Witowski J; Torbicz G; Major P; Pisarska M; Wysocki M; Budzyński A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Aug; 21(8):595-604. PubMed ID: 28795243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Stevenson AR; Solomon MJ; Lumley JW; Hewett P; Clouston AD; Gebski VJ; Davies L; Wilson K; Hague W; Simes J;
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1356-63. PubMed ID: 26441180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Fleshman J; Branda M; Sargent DJ; Boller AM; George V; Abbas M; Peters WR; Maun D; Chang G; Herline A; Fichera A; Mutch M; Wexner S; Whiteford M; Marks J; Birnbaum E; Margolin D; Larson D; Marcello P; Posner M; Read T; Monson J; Wren SM; Pisters PW; Nelson H
    JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(13):1346-55. PubMed ID: 26441179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic vs. open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Are these approaches still comparable? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Conticchio M; Papagni V; Notarnicola M; Delvecchio A; Riccelli U; Ammendola M; Currò G; Pessaux P; Silvestris N; Memeo R
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235887. PubMed ID: 32722694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controversies in Surgical Oncology: Does the Minimally Invasive Approach for Rectal Cancer Provide Equivalent Oncologic Outcomes Compared with the Open Approach?
    Cleary RK; Morris AM; Chang GJ; Halverson AL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3587-3595. PubMed ID: 30187281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision].
    Dušek T; Ferko A; Orhalmi J; Chobola M; Nikolov DH; Hovorková E; Cermáková E
    Rozhl Chir; 2013 Jun; 92(6):312-9. PubMed ID: 23965316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.
    Ma B; Gao P; Song Y; Zhang C; Zhang C; Wang L; Liu H; Wang Z
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():380. PubMed ID: 27377924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Noninferiority Meta-analysis of Quality of Surgical Resection Outcomes.
    Acuna SA; Chesney TR; Ramjist JK; Shah PS; Kennedy ED; Baxter NN
    Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):849-855. PubMed ID: 30339624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Defining Non-inferiority Margins for Quality of Surgical Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Delphi Consensus Study.
    Acuna SA; Chesney TR; Amarasekera ST; Baxter NN
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(11):3171-3178. PubMed ID: 30051366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between laparoscope-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of mid and low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis].
    Zhang X; Gao Y; Dai X; Zhang H; Cheng X; Li Q; Cai X; Shen T; Sun X; Li Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 21(8):924-935. PubMed ID: 30136274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zheng J; Feng X; Yang Z; Hu W; Luo Y; Li Y
    Oncotarget; 2017 Feb; 8(8):12717-12729. PubMed ID: 28038460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transperineal minimally invasive abdomino-perineal resection: preliminary outcomes and future perspectives.
    Arolfo S; Bullano A; Allaix ME; Arezzo A; Morino M
    Updates Surg; 2020 Mar; 72(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 31734881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review.
    Curtis NJ; Davids J; Foster JD; Francis NK
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Apr; 21(4):259-268. PubMed ID: 28470365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.