155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30302610)
41. End-user acceptance of a cloud-based teledentistry system and Android phone app for remote screening for oral diseases.
Estai M; Kanagasingam Y; Xiao D; Vignarajan J; Bunt S; Kruger E; Tennant M
J Telemed Telecare; 2017 Jan; 23(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 26721829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evaluation of a photographic method for diagnosis of gingivitis and caries.
Arnbjerg D; Poulsen S; Heidmann J
Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Aug; 100(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 1439524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Assessment of caries status among schoolchildren according to decayed-missing-filled teeth/decayed-extract-filled teeth index, International Caries Detection and Assessment System, and Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment criteria.
Reddy ER; Rani ST; Manjula M; Kumar LV; Mohan TA; Radhika E
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(5):487-492. PubMed ID: 29072208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A comparative evaluation of DIAGNOdent with visual and radiography for detection of occlusal caries: an in vitro study.
Sridhar N; Tandon S; Rao N
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 19884717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Occlusal caries: Evaluation of direct microscopy versus digital imaging used for two histological classification systems.
Jablonski-Momeni A; Ricketts DN; Stachniss V; Maschka R; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Pieper K
J Dent; 2009 Mar; 37(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 19124186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A Systematic Review on the Validity of Teledentistry.
Alabdullah JH; Daniel SJ
Telemed J E Health; 2018 Aug; 24(8):639-648. PubMed ID: 29303678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Validation of assessment of intraoral digital photography for evaluation of dental restorations in clinical research.
Signori C; Collares K; Cumerlato CBF; Correa MB; Opdam NJM; Cenci MS
J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():54-60. PubMed ID: 29438796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Photographs as a means of assessing developmental defects of enamel.
Wong HM; McGrath C; Lo EC; King NM
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):438-46. PubMed ID: 16262611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Validity of oral health screening in field conditions: pilot study.
Thompson NJ; Boyer EM
J Dent Hyg; 2006; 80(2):9. PubMed ID: 16734994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Performance of a recent light fluorescence device for detection of occlusal carious lesions in children and adolescents.
Muller-Bolla M; Joseph C; Pisapia M; Tramini P; Velly AM; Tassery H
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Jun; 18(3):187-195. PubMed ID: 28357692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The Influence of Cognitive Bias on Caries Lesion Detection in Preschool Children.
Moro BLP; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Gimenez T; Lara JS; Raggio DP; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2018; 52(5):420-428. PubMed ID: 29566393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of a full arch digital photographic assessment of caries prevalence in 5-year-old children to an established visual assessment method: a cross-sectional study.
Thomas N; Kay E; Witton R; Quinn C
BDJ Open; 2021 Aug; 7(1):32. PubMed ID: 34433801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Impact of diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of dental caries in Norwegian children aged 5, 12 and 18 years.
Amarante E; Raadal M; Espelid I
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Apr; 26(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 9645401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation.
Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Santos-Pinto L; Lussi A; Cordeiro RC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 22467694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate?
Smythe T; Nogaro MC; Clifton LJ; Mudariki D; Theologis T; Lavy C
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232878. PubMed ID: 32413066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. In vivo and in vitro comparison of ICDAS II, DIAGNOdent pen, CarieScan PRO and SoproLife camera for occlusal caries detection in primary molar teeth.
Kockanat A; Unal M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Jun; 18(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 28598179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Bioluminescence System for the Assessment of Caries Activity on Occlusal Surfaces.
Jablonski-Momeni A; Moos J; Sakhaei Manesh V; Stoll R
Caries Res; 2018; 52(4):279-287. PubMed ID: 29393160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The accuracy of asynchronous tele-screening for detecting dental caries in patient-captured mobile photos: A pilot study.
Qari AH; Hadi M; Alaidarous A; Aboalreesh A; Alqahtani M; Bamaga IK; Patel J; Estai M
Saudi Dent J; 2024 Jan; 36(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 38375381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of dental hygienists and dentists: clinical and teledentistry identification of dental caries in children.
Daniel SJ; Kumar S
Int J Dent Hyg; 2017 Nov; 15(4):e143-e148. PubMed ID: 27256722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Diagnostic Performance of Different Methods in Detecting Incipient Non-Cavitated Occlusal Caries Lesions in Permanent Teeth.
Ünal M; Koçkanat A; Güler S; Gültürk E
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(3):173-179. PubMed ID: 30964722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
