149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30303604)
1. Use of chitosan membranes after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy improves early recovery of sexual potency: results of a comparative study.
Porpiglia F; Manfredi M; Checcucci E; Garrou D; De Cillis S; Amparore D; De Luca S; Fregnan F; Stura I; Migliaretti G; Fiori C
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):465-473. PubMed ID: 30303604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chitosan membranes applied on the prostatic neurovascular bundles after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a phase II study.
Porpiglia F; Bertolo R; Fiori C; Manfredi M; De Cillis S; Geuna S
BJU Int; 2018 Mar; 121(3):472-478. PubMed ID: 28710845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane accelerate the return to potency after a nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy? Propensity score-matched analysis.
Ogaya-Pinies G; Palayapalam-Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Hernandez-Cardona E; Rocco B; Coelho RF; Jenson C; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2018 Jun; 12(2):235-243. PubMed ID: 28656504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Tandon S; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 27251473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance of erection hardness score as a diagnostic tool to assess erectile function recovery in Japanese men after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Miyake H; Miyazaki A; Yao A; Hinata N; Fujisawa M
J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 26994775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive modelling of 2-year potency outcomes using a novel 90-day erection fullness scale after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Huynh LM; Osann K; Skarecky D; Ahlering TE
BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):249-254. PubMed ID: 29520949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Bonet X; Ogaya-Pinies G; Woodlief T; Hernandez-Cardona E; Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Vigués F; Patel V
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):837-844. PubMed ID: 30126045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toggling Technique Allows Retrograde Early Release to Facilitate Neurovascular Bundle Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.
Shim JS; Tae JH; Noh TI; Kang SH; Cheon J; Lee JG; Patel VR; Kang SG
J Korean Med Sci; 2022 Jan; 37(1):e6. PubMed ID: 34981681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on lower urinary tract function: Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes and frequency volume charts.
Haga N; Hata J; Matsuoka K; Koguchi T; Akaihata H; Kataoka M; Sato Y; Ogawa S; Ishibashi K; Kojima Y
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Jan; 37(1):322-330. PubMed ID: 28452451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting - a prospective observational comparative study.
Mirmilstein G; Rai BP; Gbolahan O; Srirangam V; Narula A; Agarwal S; Lane TM; Vasdev N; Adshead J
BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):854-862. PubMed ID: 29124889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery?
Ko YH; Coelho RF; Sivaraman A; Schatloff O; Chauhan S; Abdul-Muhsin HM; Carrion RJ; Palmer KJ; Cheon J; Patel VR
Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 23092543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does surgeon subjective nerve sparing score predict recovery time of erectile function following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
Kang SG; Schatloff O; Haidar AM; Samavedi S; Palmer KJ; Cheon J; Patel VR
J Sex Med; 2015 Jun; 12(6):1490-6. PubMed ID: 25689342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nerve spare robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with amniotic membranes: medium term outcomes.
Noël J; Mascarenhas A; Patel E; Reddy S; Sandri M; Bhat S; Moschovas M; Rogers T; Ahmed S; Stirt D; Patel V
J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1219-1224. PubMed ID: 35015249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Starting Penile Rehabilitation with Sildenafil Immediately after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy on Erectile Function Recovery: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Jo JK; Jeong SJ; Oh JJ; Lee SW; Lee S; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1600-1606. PubMed ID: 29307683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recovery of Baseline Erectile Function in Men Following Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Analysis Using Validated Measures.
Sridhar AN; Cathcart PJ; Yap T; Hines J; Nathan S; Briggs TP; Kelly JD; Minhas S
J Sex Med; 2016 Mar; 13(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 26944466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches.
Menon M; Dalela D; Jamil M; Diaz M; Tallman C; Abdollah F; Sood A; Lehtola L; Miller D; Jeong W
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 29225060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
