These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30303762)

  • 1. Cross-modal phonetic encoding facilitates the McGurk illusion and phonemic restoration.
    Abbott NT; Shahin AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 30303762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural evidence accounting for interindividual variability of the McGurk illusion.
    Shahin AJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Aug; 707():134322. PubMed ID: 31181299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rethinking the Mechanisms Underlying the McGurk Illusion.
    Gonzales MG; Backer KC; Mandujano B; Shahin AJ
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():616049. PubMed ID: 33867954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual Enhancement of Relevant Speech in a 'Cocktail Party'.
    Jaha N; Shen S; Kerlin JR; Shahin AJ
    Multisens Res; 2020 Feb; 33(3):277-294. PubMed ID: 32508080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of the N1-P2 auditory evoked response to amplitude rise time and rate of formant transition of speech sounds.
    Carpenter AL; Shahin AJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Jun; 544():56-61. PubMed ID: 23570734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual context due to speech-reading suppresses the auditory response to acoustic interruptions in speech.
    Bhat J; Pitt MA; Shahin AJ
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():173. PubMed ID: 25053937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility.
    Sekiyama K; Tohkura Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1797-805. PubMed ID: 1960275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Processing of audiovisually congruent and incongruent speech in school-age children with a history of specific language impairment: a behavioral and event-related potentials study.
    Kaganovich N; Schumaker J; Macias D; Gustafson D
    Dev Sci; 2015 Sep; 18(5):751-70. PubMed ID: 25440407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Theta oscillations reflect conflict processing in the perception of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L; Torralba M; Soto-Faraco S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 48(7):2630-2641. PubMed ID: 29250857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L; Macaluso E; Soto-Faraco S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5691-5705. PubMed ID: 28792094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech-specific audiovisual integration modulates induced theta-band oscillations.
    Lindborg A; Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J; Andersen TS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219744. PubMed ID: 31310616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the McGurk effect for spoken and sung syllables.
    Quinto L; Thompson WF; Russo FA; Trehub SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20675792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The McGurk Illusion: A Default Mechanism of the Auditory System.
    Iqbal ZJ; Shahin AJ; Bortfeld H; Backer KC
    Brain Sci; 2023 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 36979322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Motor Network Reduces Multisensory Illusory Perception.
    Murakami T; Abe M; Wiratman W; Fujiwara J; Okamoto M; Mizuochi-Endo T; Iwabuchi T; Makuuchi M; Yamashita A; Tiksnadi A; Chang FY; Kubo H; Matsuda N; Kobayashi S; Eifuku S; Ugawa Y
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(45):9679-9688. PubMed ID: 30249803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiovisual perception of congruent and incongruent Dutch front vowels.
    Valkenier B; Duyne JY; Andringa TC; Baskent D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1788-801. PubMed ID: 22992710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatio-temporal distribution of brain activity associated with audio-visually congruent and incongruent speech and the McGurk Effect.
    Pratt H; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Brain Behav; 2015 Nov; 5(11):e00407. PubMed ID: 26664791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual uncertainty explains activation differences between audiovisual congruent speech and McGurk stimuli.
    Dong C; Noppeney U; Wang S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Mar; 45(4):e26653. PubMed ID: 38488460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.