299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30303762)
1. Cross-modal phonetic encoding facilitates the McGurk illusion and phonemic restoration.
Abbott NT; Shahin AJ
J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 30303762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neural evidence accounting for interindividual variability of the McGurk illusion.
Shahin AJ
Neurosci Lett; 2019 Aug; 707():134322. PubMed ID: 31181299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rethinking the Mechanisms Underlying the McGurk Illusion.
Gonzales MG; Backer KC; Mandujano B; Shahin AJ
Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():616049. PubMed ID: 33867954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual Enhancement of Relevant Speech in a 'Cocktail Party'.
Jaha N; Shen S; Kerlin JR; Shahin AJ
Multisens Res; 2020 Feb; 33(3):277-294. PubMed ID: 32508080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of the N1-P2 auditory evoked response to amplitude rise time and rate of formant transition of speech sounds.
Carpenter AL; Shahin AJ
Neurosci Lett; 2013 Jun; 544():56-61. PubMed ID: 23570734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual context due to speech-reading suppresses the auditory response to acoustic interruptions in speech.
Bhat J; Pitt MA; Shahin AJ
Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():173. PubMed ID: 25053937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility.
Sekiyama K; Tohkura Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1797-805. PubMed ID: 1960275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Processing of audiovisually congruent and incongruent speech in school-age children with a history of specific language impairment: a behavioral and event-related potentials study.
Kaganovich N; Schumaker J; Macias D; Gustafson D
Dev Sci; 2015 Sep; 18(5):751-70. PubMed ID: 25440407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Theta oscillations reflect conflict processing in the perception of the McGurk illusion.
Morís Fernández L; Torralba M; Soto-Faraco S
Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 48(7):2630-2641. PubMed ID: 29250857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.
Morís Fernández L; Macaluso E; Soto-Faraco S
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5691-5705. PubMed ID: 28792094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech-specific audiovisual integration modulates induced theta-band oscillations.
Lindborg A; Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J; Andersen TS
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219744. PubMed ID: 31310616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the McGurk effect for spoken and sung syllables.
Quinto L; Thompson WF; Russo FA; Trehub SE
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20675792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The McGurk Illusion: A Default Mechanism of the Auditory System.
Iqbal ZJ; Shahin AJ; Bortfeld H; Backer KC
Brain Sci; 2023 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 36979322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Motor Network Reduces Multisensory Illusory Perception.
Murakami T; Abe M; Wiratman W; Fujiwara J; Okamoto M; Mizuochi-Endo T; Iwabuchi T; Makuuchi M; Yamashita A; Tiksnadi A; Chang FY; Kubo H; Matsuda N; Kobayashi S; Eifuku S; Ugawa Y
J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(45):9679-9688. PubMed ID: 30249803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Audiovisual perception of congruent and incongruent Dutch front vowels.
Valkenier B; Duyne JY; Andringa TC; Baskent D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1788-801. PubMed ID: 22992710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatio-temporal distribution of brain activity associated with audio-visually congruent and incongruent speech and the McGurk Effect.
Pratt H; Bleich N; Mittelman N
Brain Behav; 2015 Nov; 5(11):e00407. PubMed ID: 26664791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual uncertainty explains activation differences between audiovisual congruent speech and McGurk stimuli.
Dong C; Noppeney U; Wang S
Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Mar; 45(4):e26653. PubMed ID: 38488460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
