These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30303762)

  • 41. Multimodal integration in statistical learning: evidence from the McGurk illusion.
    Mitchel AD; Christiansen MH; Weiss DJ
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():407. PubMed ID: 24904449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of invisible lip movements on phonetic perception.
    Teramoto W; Ernst MO
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6478. PubMed ID: 37081084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Audio-visual integration in noise: Influence of auditory and visual stimulus degradation on eye movements and perception of the McGurk effect.
    Stacey JE; Howard CJ; Mitra S; Stacey PC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3544-3557. PubMed ID: 32533526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Audio-visual speech processing in age-related hearing loss: Stronger integration and increased frontal lobe recruitment.
    Rosemann S; Thiel CM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():425-437. PubMed ID: 29655940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Developmental Trajectory of McGurk Effect Susceptibility in Children and Adults With Amblyopia.
    Narinesingh C; Goltz HC; Raashid RA; Wong AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 56(3):2107-13. PubMed ID: 25744982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Mismatch negativity evoked by the McGurk-MacDonald effect: a phonetic representation within short-term memory.
    Colin C; Radeau M; Soquet A; Demolin D; Colin F; Deltenre P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Apr; 113(4):495-506. PubMed ID: 11955994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cultural and linguistic factors in audiovisual speech processing: the McGurk effect in Chinese subjects.
    Sekiyama K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 9038409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Neural restoration of degraded audiovisual speech.
    Shahin AJ; Kerlin JR; Bhat J; Miller LM
    Neuroimage; 2012 Mar; 60(1):530-8. PubMed ID: 22178454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Discrimination tests of visually influenced syllables.
    Rosenblum LD; Saldaña HM
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Oct; 52(4):461-73. PubMed ID: 1437479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The McGurk phenomenon in Italian listeners.
    Bovo R; Ciorba A; Prosser S; Martini A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2009 Aug; 29(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 20161878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Perceptual restoration of a "missing" speech sound: auditory induction or illusion?
    Repp BH
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):14-32. PubMed ID: 1549420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology.
    Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Dec; 110(4):474-94. PubMed ID: 6459403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Perception of the auditory-visual illusion in speech perception by children with phonological disorders.
    Dodd B; McIntosh B; Erdener D; Burnham D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Jan; 22(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 18092221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bayesian binding and fusion models explain illusion and enhancement effects in audiovisual speech perception.
    Lindborg A; Andersen TS
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246986. PubMed ID: 33606815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
    Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1061-77. PubMed ID: 22894226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Changed categorical perception of consonant-vowel syllables induced by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
    Heimrath K; Fischer A; Heinze HJ; Zaehle T
    BMC Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 17():8. PubMed ID: 26831504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Auditory-visual integration during nonconscious perception.
    Ching ASM; Kim J; Davis C
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():1-15. PubMed ID: 30925308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A neural basis for interindividual differences in the McGurk effect, a multisensory speech illusion.
    Nath AR; Beauchamp MS
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):781-7. PubMed ID: 21787869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Sharma A; Kraus N; McGee TJ; Nicol TG
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Nov; 104(6):540-5. PubMed ID: 9402896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion.
    Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Oct; 7(5):1124-31. PubMed ID: 6457110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.