BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30303909)

  • 1. A Decision Analysis Model of 1-Year Effectiveness of Intended Postplacental Compared With Intended Delayed Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion.
    Sonalkar S; Hunter T; Gurney EP; McAllister A; Schreiber CA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 132(5):1211-1221. PubMed ID: 30303909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postpartum IUDS: keys for success.
    O'Hanley K; Huber DH
    Contraception; 1992 Apr; 45(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 1516367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Whitaker AK; Endres LK; Mistretta SQ; Gilliam ML
    Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 24457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Society of Family Planning Guidelines: Postplacental insertion of intrauterine devices.
    Whitaker AK; Chen BA
    Contraception; 2018 Jan; 97(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 28987293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices.
    Cohen R; Sheeder J; Arango N; Teal SB; Tocce K
    Contraception; 2016 Feb; 93(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26475368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the copper intrauterine device.
    Hinz EK; Murthy A; Wang B; Ryan N; Ades V
    Contraception; 2019 Aug; 100(2):101-105. PubMed ID: 31108053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of postplacental insertion of GyneFix postpartum intrauterine device among women undergoing cesarean section: A multicenter prospective cohort study in China.
    Che Y; Hou GF; Zhang HP; Yang H; Lin SJ; Gan T; Yang WH; Shi CH; Ren WJ; Xu YQ; Yin BM; Chen TT; Gan YJ; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Cheng LN
    Contraception; 2023 Jun; 122():109999. PubMed ID: 36849032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: randomized study.
    Tatum HJ; Beltran RS; Ramos R; Van Kets H; Sivin I; Schmidt FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Nov; 175(5):1231-5. PubMed ID: 8942493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Chen BA; Reeves MF; Hayes JL; Hohmann HL; Perriera LK; Creinin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 116(5):1079-87. PubMed ID: 20966692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors associated with missing strings and expulsion after postplacental insertion of copper T380A intrauterine devices.
    da Silva Nóbrega AB; Pitangui ACR; Vieira CS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Apr; 157(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 34197636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current status of frameless anchored IUD for immediate intracesarean insertion.
    Wildemeersch D; Goldstuck ND; Hasskamp T
    Dev Period Med; 2016; 20(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27416620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception.
    Lopez LM; Bernholc A; Hubacher D; Stuart G; Van Vliet HA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD003036. PubMed ID: 26115018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of two techniques used in immediate postplacental insertion (IPPI) of the Copper T-380A IUD in Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
    Xu JX; Rivera R; Dunson TR; Zhuang LQ; Yang XL; Ma GT; Chi IC
    Contraception; 1996 Jul; 54(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8804806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound location of intrauterine devices placed at cesarean section over the first year postpartum.
    Gonzalez J; Stimmel S; Rana R; Diggs AI; Pan S; Overbey J; Thomas AG; Lunde B
    Contraception; 2020 Jun; 101(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 32201097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of ultrasound in predicting success of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion immediately after delivery.
    Dias T; Abeykoon S; Kumarasiri S; Gunawardena C; Padeniya T; D'Antonio F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 46(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 25418016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Celen S; Möröy P; Sucak A; Aktulay A; Danişman N
    Contraception; 2004 Apr; 69(4):279-82. PubMed ID: 15033401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis.
    Reeves MF; Smith KJ; Creinin MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1286-94. PubMed ID: 17540799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery.
    Gurney EP; Sonalkar S; McAllister A; Sammel MD; Schreiber CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):183.e1-183.e9. PubMed ID: 29870737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Timing of postpartum intrauterine device placement: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Washington CI; Jamshidi R; Thung SF; Nayeri UA; Caughey AB; Werner EF
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jan; 103(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 25439838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Six-month and 1-year continuation rates following postpartum insertion of implants and intrauterine devices.
    Woo I; Seifert S; Hendricks D; Jamshidi RM; Burke AE; Fox MC
    Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):532-5. PubMed ID: 26408376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.