These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30303921)
1. Effect of Minimum-Volume Standards on Patient Outcomes and Surgical Practice Patterns for Hysterectomy. Ruiz MP; Chen L; Hou JY; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 132(5):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 30303921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus. Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications. Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications. Mehta A; Xu T; Hutfless S; Makary MA; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Stone RL; Wang K; Fader AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):497.e1-497.e10. PubMed ID: 28034651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer. Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of surgical volume on route of hysterectomy and short-term morbidity. Boyd LR; Novetsky AP; Curtin JP Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 116(4):909-915. PubMed ID: 20859155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative outcomes in hysterectomy. Vree FE; Cohen SL; Chavan N; Einarsson JI JSLS; 2014; 18(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24960479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs. Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy. Louie M; Strassle PD; Moulder JK; Dizon AM; Schiff LD; Carey ET Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):480.e1-480.e8. PubMed ID: 29959931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers. Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advanced Training of Gynecologic Surgeons and Incidence of Intraoperative Complications after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study of More Than 2000 Cases at a Single Institution. McDonnell RM; Hollingworth JL; Chivers P; Cohen PA; Salfinger SG J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):810-815. PubMed ID: 29253636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discharge Readiness after Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. DeStephano CC; Gajarawala SP; Espinal M; Heckman MG; Vargas ER; Robertson MA J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):910-918. PubMed ID: 30240901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]