147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30304974)
41. Validity and Reliability Evaluation of Four Commercial Activity Trackers' Step Counting Performance.
Tophøj KH; Petersen MG; Sæbye C; Baad-Hansen T; Wagner S
Telemed J E Health; 2018 Sep; 24(9):669-677. PubMed ID: 29303680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Physical activity monitoring in stroke: SenseWear Pro2 activity accelerometer versus Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200 pedometer.
Vanroy C; Vissers D; Cras P; Beyne S; Feys H; Vanlandewijck Y; Truijen S
Disabil Rehabil; 2014; 36(20):1695-703. PubMed ID: 24279597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Acceptability and utility of, and preference for wearable activity trackers amongst non-metropolitan cancer survivors.
Hardcastle SJ; Galliott M; Lynch BM; Nguyen NH; Cohen PA; Mohan GR; Johansen NJ; Saunders C
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0210039. PubMed ID: 30596781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Validity of activity monitors worn at multiple nontraditional locations under controlled and free-living conditions in young adult women.
Kumahara H; Ayabe M; Ichibakase M; Tashima A; Chiwata M; Takashi T
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2015 May; 40(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 25832964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The Choice of Pedometer Impacts on Daily Step Counts in Primary School Children under Free-Living Conditions.
Tanaka C; Hikihara Y; Inoue S; Tanaka S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(22):. PubMed ID: 31717474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Concurrent validation of the Actigraph gt3x+, Polar Active accelerometer, Omron HJ-720 and Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 pedometer step counts in lab-based and free-living settings.
Lee JA; Williams SM; Brown DD; Laurson KR
J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 25517396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of GT3X accelerometer and YAMAX pedometer steps/day in a free-living sample of overweight and obese adults.
Barriera TV; Tudor-Locke C; Champagne CM; Broyles ST; Johnson WD; Katzmarzyk PT
J Phys Act Health; 2013 Feb; 10(2):263-70. PubMed ID: 22821951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions.
Le Masurier GC; Tudor-Locke C
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 May; 35(5):867-71. PubMed ID: 12750599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Accuracy of piezoelectric pedometer and accelerometer step counts.
Cruz J; Brooks D; Marques A
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2017 Apr; 57(4):426-433. PubMed ID: 26796079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A comparative analysis of pedometry in measuring physical activity of children.
Scruggs PW
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Oct; 39(10):1837-46. PubMed ID: 17909413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation.
Sirard JR; Masteller B; Freedson PS; Mendoza A; Hickey A
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e250. PubMed ID: 28724509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Whole-day and segmented-day physical activity variability of northwest England school children.
Fairclough SJ; Butcher ZH; Stratton G
Prev Med; 2007 May; 44(5):421-5. PubMed ID: 17320158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Validation of the ADAMO Care Watch for step counting in older adults.
Magistro D; Brustio PR; Ivaldi M; Esliger DW; Zecca M; Rainoldi A; Boccia G
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0190753. PubMed ID: 29425196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Non-traditional wearing positions of pedometers: validity and reliability of the Omron HJ-203-ED pedometer under controlled and free-living conditions.
De Cocker KA; De Meyer J; De Bourdeaudhuij IM; Cardon GM
J Sci Med Sport; 2012 Sep; 15(5):418-24. PubMed ID: 22483530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reliability and validity of two fitness tracker devices in the laboratory and home environment for older community-dwelling people.
Burton E; Hill KD; Lautenschlager NT; Thøgersen-Ntoumani C; Lewin G; Boyle E; Howie E
BMC Geriatr; 2018 May; 18(1):103. PubMed ID: 29724191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Do They Need Goals or Support? A Report from a Goal-Setting Intervention Using Physical Activity Monitors in Youth.
Bronikowski M; Bronikowska M; Glapa A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Sep; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 27649219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Pedometer-determined physical activity levels of adolescents: differences by age, sex, time of week, and transportation mode to school.
Hohepa M; Schofield G; Kolt GS; Scragg R; Garrett N
J Phys Act Health; 2008; 5 Suppl 1():S140-52. PubMed ID: 18364518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Validity of smartphone pedometer applications.
Orr K; Howe HS; Omran J; Smith KA; Palmateer TM; Ma AE; Faulkner G
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Nov; 8():733. PubMed ID: 26621351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.
Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
