BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30305252)

  • 1. Do visual aids influenced patients' risk perceptions for rare and very rare risks?
    Fraenkel L; Reyna V; Cozmuta R; Cornell D; Nolte J; Wilhelms E
    Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Nov; 101(11):1900-1905. PubMed ID: 30305252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET
    Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):582-627. PubMed ID: 28192674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of decision aids on patient preferences for anticoagulant therapy: a randomized trial.
    Holbrook A; Labiris R; Goldsmith CH; Ota K; Harb S; Sebaldt RJ
    CMAJ; 2007 May; 176(11):1583-7. PubMed ID: 17515584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving risk literacy in surgeons.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Wicki B; Joeris A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jul; 99(7):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 26879804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of game-like interactive graphics on risk perceptions and decisions.
    Ancker JS; Weber EU; Kukafka R
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 20393103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Ubel PA; Smith DM; Derry HA; McClure JB; Stark A; Pitsch RK; Fagerlin A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Nov; 73(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 18602242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Message Formats, Numeracy, Risk Perceptions of Alcohol-Attributable Cancer, and Intentions for Binge Drinking Among College Students.
    Chen Y; Yang ZJ
    J Drug Educ; 2015; 45(1):37-55. PubMed ID: 26376688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial.
    Edwards A; Thomas R; Williams R; Ellner AL; Brown P; Elwyn G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):336-49. PubMed ID: 16860964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Explanatory Images on Risk Perceptions and Treatment Preference.
    Cozmuta R; Wilhelms E; Cornell D; Nolte J; Reyna V; Fraenkel L
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2018 Nov; 70(11):1707-1711. PubMed ID: 29342509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
    O'Connor AM; Bennett CL; Stacey D; Barry M; Col NF; Eden KB; Entwistle VA; Fiset V; Holmes-Rovner M; Khangura S; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Rovner D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jul; (3):CD001431. PubMed ID: 19588325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study.
    McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective communication of risks to young adults: using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Sep; 17(3):270-87. PubMed ID: 21942316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patients' Attitudes Regarding Lung Cancer Screening and Decision Aids. A Survey and Focus Group Study.
    Crothers K; Kross EK; Reisch LM; Shahrir S; Slatore C; Zeliadt SB; Triplette M; Meza R; Elmore JG
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Nov; 13(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 27652509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks [corrected].
    Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Apr; 70(7):1019-25. PubMed ID: 20116159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What makes a good format: frameworks for evaluating the effect of graphic risk formats on consumers' risk-related behavior.
    Civan A; Doctor JN; Wolf FM
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():927. PubMed ID: 16779213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Tabular and Icon Fact Box Formats on Comprehension of Benefits and Harms of Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Trial.
    McDowell M; Gigerenzer G; Wegwarth O; Rebitschek FG
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Jan; 39(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 30799691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
    Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strengths and Gaps in Physicians' Risk Communication: A Scenario Study of the Influence of Numeracy on Cancer Screening Communication.
    Petrova D; Kostopoulou O; Delaney BC; Cokely ET; Garcia-Retamero R
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):355-365. PubMed ID: 28884617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design, development, and evaluation of visual aids for communicating prescription drug instructions to nonliterate patients in rural Cameroon.
    Ngoh LN; Shepherd MD
    Patient Educ Couns; 1997 Mar; 30(3):257-70. PubMed ID: 9104382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.