These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30305658)

  • 1. Bone mineral density assessment using iterative reconstruction compared with quantitative computed tomography as the standard of reference.
    Mann C; Ziegeler K; Mews J; Plaschke M; Issever AS
    Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15095. PubMed ID: 30305658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A low-radiation exposure protocol for 3D QCT of the spine.
    Museyko O; Heinemann A; Krause M; Wulff B; Amling M; Püschel K; Glüer CC; Kalender W; Engelke K
    Osteoporos Int; 2014 Mar; 25(3):983-92. PubMed ID: 24142100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of low-tube current with iterative model reconstruction on Philips Brilliance iCT Elite FHD in the accuracy of spinal QCT using a European spine phantom.
    Wu Y; Jiang Y; Han X; Wang M; Gao J
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2018 Feb; 8(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 29541621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality of low-dose CT of the lumbar spine.
    Alshamari M; Geijer M; Norrman E; Lidén M; Krauss W; Jendeberg J; Magnuson A; Geijer H
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Jun; 58(6):702-709. PubMed ID: 28157395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deep-learning image reconstruction for image quality evaluation and accurate bone mineral density measurement on quantitative CT: A phantom-patient study.
    Li Y; Jiang Y; Yu X; Ren B; Wang C; Chen S; Ma D; Su D; Liu H; Ren X; Yang X; Gao J; Wu Y
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():884306. PubMed ID: 36034436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine?
    Salzmann SN; Shirahata T; Yang J; Miller CO; Carlson BB; Rentenberger C; Carrino JA; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 30343044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultralow-dose CT of the craniofacial bone for navigated surgery using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction: 2D and 3D image quality.
    Widmann G; Schullian P; Gassner EM; Hoermann R; Bale R; Puelacher W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):563-9. PubMed ID: 25714286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose reduction in CT urography and vasculature phantom studies using model-based iterative reconstruction.
    Page L; Wei W; Kundra V; Rong XJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):334-342. PubMed ID: 27929506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of radiation dose for CT detection of lytic and sclerotic bone lesions: a phantom study.
    Greffier J; Frandon J; Pereira F; Hamard A; Beregi JP; Larbi A; Omoumi P
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1075-1078. PubMed ID: 31506818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction.
    Becce F; Ben Salah Y; Verdun FR; Vande Berg BC; Lecouvet FE; Meuli R; Omoumi P
    Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Jul; 42(7):937-45. PubMed ID: 23359034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Liquid Calibration Phantoms in Ultra-Low-Dose QCT for the Assessment of Bone Mineral Density.
    Malekzadeh M; Abbasi-Rad S; Keyak JH; Nabil M; Asadi M; Mobini N; Naghdi P; Emadi H; Saligheh Rad H; Shiran MB
    J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(1):108-116. PubMed ID: 30902572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image Quality and Radiation Dose of CT Coronary Angiography with Automatic Tube Current Modulation and Strong Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-Dimensional (AIDR3D).
    Shen H; Dai G; Luo M; Duan C; Cai W; Liang D; Wang X; Zhu D; Li W; Qiu J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142185. PubMed ID: 26599111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thoracic Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Can Sensitively Monitor Bone Mineral Metabolism: Comparison of Thoracic QCT vs Lumbar QCT and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Detection of Age-relative Change in Bone Mineral Density.
    Mao SS; Li D; Syed YS; Gao Y; Luo Y; Flores F; Child J; Cervantes M; Kalantar-Zadeh K; Budoff MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 28844601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Highly reduced-dose CT of the lumbar spine in a human cadaver model.
    Warncke ML; Wiese NJ; Tahir E; Sehner S; Heinemann A; Regier M; Püschel K; Adam G; Weinrich JM; Laqmani A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240199. PubMed ID: 33031418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol.
    Klink T; Obmann V; Heverhagen J; Stork A; Adam G; Begemann P
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1645-54. PubMed ID: 25037931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of applied dose and image quality in staging CT of neuroendocrine tumor patients using standard filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Böning G; Schäfer M; Grupp U; Kaul D; Kahn J; Pavel M; Maurer M; Denecke T; Hamm B; Streitparth F
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 84(8):1601-1607. PubMed ID: 25963505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing Radiation Dose at Chest CT: Comparison Among Model-based Type Iterative Reconstruction, Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection.
    de Margerie-Mellon C; de Bazelaire C; Montlahuc C; Lambert J; Martineau A; Coulon P; de Kerviler E; Beigelman C
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1246-54. PubMed ID: 27346234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
    Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.