218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30306328)
21. [New Potential Method for Optimizing the ATCM Technique in Pediatric CT Examination].
Yoshiura T; Masuda T; Matsumoto Y; Sato T; Kikuhara Y; Kobayashi Y; Ishibashi T; Oku T; Funama Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(8):802-807. PubMed ID: 32814735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Variation in CT Number and Image Noise Uniformity According to Patient Positioning in MDCT.
Szczykutowicz TP; DuPlissis A; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1064-1072. PubMed ID: 28267350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. IMPLICATIONS OF PATIENT CENTRING ON ORGAN DOSE IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
Kataria B; Sandborg M; Althén JN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):130-5. PubMed ID: 26743256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A new markerless patient-to-image registration method using a portable 3D scanner.
Fan Y; Jiang D; Wang M; Song Z
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101910. PubMed ID: 25281962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of surface registration compared to conventional volumetric registration in patient positioning for head-and-neck radiotherapy: a simulation study using patient data.
Kim Y; Li R; Na YH; Lee R; Xing L
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121701. PubMed ID: 25471948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of non-rigid anatomy and patient positioning on endoscopy-CT image registration in the head and neck.
Ingram WS; Yang J; Wendt R; Beadle BM; Rao A; Wang XA; Court LE
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4159-4168. PubMed ID: 28513864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. THE SIZE-SPECIFIC DOSE ESTIMATE (SSDE) FOR TRUNCATED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES.
Anam C; Haryanto F; Widita R; Arif I; Dougherty G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jul; 175(3):313-320. PubMed ID: 27885082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Patient-bounded extrapolation using low-dose priors for volume-of-interest imaging in C-arm CT.
Xia Y; Bauer S; Maier A; Berger M; Hornegger J
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1787-96. PubMed ID: 25832069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of isocenter alignment during CT colonography: Implications for clinical practice.
Olden KL; Kavanagh RG; James K; Twomey M; Moloney F; Moore N; Carey K; Murphy KP; Grey TM; Nicholson P; Chopra R; Maher MM; O'Connor OJ
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Nov; 24(4):334-339. PubMed ID: 30292502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Iterative reconstruction and automatic tube voltage selection reduce clinical CT radiation doses and image noise.
O'Hora L; Foley SJ
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Feb; 24(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 29306371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Vertical Off-Centering in Reduced Dose Chest-CT: Impact on Effective Dose and Image Noise Values.
Eberhard M; Blüthgen C; Barth BK; Frauenfelder T; Saltybaeva N; Martini K
Acad Radiol; 2020 Apr; 27(4):508-517. PubMed ID: 31358357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Deep learning-based age estimation from clinical Computed Tomography image data of the thorax and abdomen in the adult population.
Kerber B; Hepp T; Küstner T; Gatidis S
PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0292993. PubMed ID: 37934735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of daily patient positioning for radiotherapy with a commercial 3D surface-imaging system (Catalyst™).
Walter F; Freislederer P; Belka C; Heinz C; Söhn M; Roeder F
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Nov; 11(1):154. PubMed ID: 27881158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Semiautomated thoracic and abdominal computed tomography segmentation using the belief functions theory: application to 3D internal dosimetry.
Dieudonné A; Zhang P; Vannoorenberghe P; Gardin I
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2007 Apr; 22(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17600476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study.
Bettinardi V; Mancosu P; Danna M; Giovacchini G; Landoni C; Picchio M; Gilardi MC; Savi A; Castiglioni I; Lecchi M; Fazio F
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Sep; 51(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 17464266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improvement of image quality and dose management in CT fluoroscopy by iterative 3D image reconstruction.
Grosser OS; Wybranski C; Kupitz D; Powerski M; Mohnike K; Pech M; Amthauer H; Ricke J
Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3625-3634. PubMed ID: 28168371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dose reduction in 64-row whole-body CT in multiple trauma: an optimized CT protocol with iterative image reconstruction on a gemstone-based scintillator.
Geyer LL; Körner M; Harrieder A; Mueck FG; Deak Z; Wirth S; Linsenmaier U
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1061):20160003. PubMed ID: 26853510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Routine CT scanning of patients retrieved to a tertiary centre on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective risk benefit analysis.
Richmond KM; Warburton KG; Finney SJ; Shah S; Reddi BAJ
Perfusion; 2018 Sep; 33(6):438-444. PubMed ID: 29529977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Size-specific dose estimations for pediatric chest, abdomen/pelvis and head CT scans with the use of GATE.
Kostou T; Papadimitroulas P; Papaconstadopoulos P; Devic S; Seuntjens J; Kagadis GC
Phys Med; 2019 Sep; 65():181-190. PubMed ID: 31494372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
