These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30306538)

  • 1. Implementing systematic reviews of prognosis studies in Cochrane.
    Moons KG; Hooft L; Williams K; Hayden JA; Damen JA; Riley RD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 10(10):ED000129. PubMed ID: 30306538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Profile of Published Cochrane Systematic Reviews in Child Health From Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
    Sinha A; Ovelman C; Pradhan A; Gupta N; Thumburu K; Gupta P
    Indian Pediatr; 2019 Jan; 56(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 30806361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool.
    Martimbianco ALC; Sá KMM; Santos GM; Santos EM; Pacheco RL; Riera R
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(3):469-472. PubMed ID: 36820779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prognostic factors for persistent symptoms in adults with mild traumatic brain injury: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.
    Déry J; De Guise É; Bussières ÈL; Lamontagne ME
    Syst Rev; 2021 Sep; 10(1):254. PubMed ID: 34556172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study.
    Petkovic J; Trawin J; Dewidar O; Yoganathan M; Tugwell P; Welch V
    Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 7(1):113. PubMed ID: 30068380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability.
    Babic A; Tokalic R; Amílcar Silva Cunha J; Novak I; Suto J; Vidak M; Miosic I; Vuka I; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):76. PubMed ID: 30953448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic survey showed important limitations in the methods for assessing drug safety among systematic reviews.
    Li L; Deng K; Busse JW; Zhou X; Xu C; Liu Z; Ren Y; Zou K; Sun X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():80-90. PubMed ID: 32247024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reporting of safety among drug systematic reviews was poor before the implementation of the PRISMA harms checklist.
    Li L; Xu C; Deng K; Zhou X; Liu Z; Busse JW; Ren Y; Zou K; Sun X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():125-135. PubMed ID: 30278212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The judgement of biases included in the category "other bias" in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey.
    Babic A; Pijuk A; Brázdilová L; Georgieva Y; Raposo Pereira MA; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):77. PubMed ID: 30971219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook.
    Barcot O; Boric M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Cavar M; Dosenovic S; Vuka I; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):170. PubMed ID: 31382898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews.
    Carroll C; Kaltenthaler E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):35. PubMed ID: 29739352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 100 systematic reviews of trials.
    Wuytack F; Regan M; Biesty L; Meskell P; Lutomski JE; O'Donnell M; Treweek S; Devane D
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 30621793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study.
    Steegmans PAJ; Bipat S; Meursinge Reynders RA
    Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 8(1):89. PubMed ID: 30953538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conclusiveness of Cochrane Reviews in physiotherapy: a systematic search and analytical review.
    Momosaki R; Tsuboi M; Yasufuku Y; Furudate K; Kamo T; Uda K; Tanaka Y; Abo M
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2019 Jun; 42(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 30664013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Shah K; Egan G; Huan LN; Kirkham J; Reid E; Tejani AM
    BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e032497. PubMed ID: 32184303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role and limitations of Cochrane reviews at the bedside: a systematic synopsis of five pediatric subspecialties.
    Meyer S; Poryo M; Khosrawikatoli S; Goda Y; Zemlin M
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2017 Sep; 167(11-12):276-281. PubMed ID: 28255743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of information sources used in Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews: A case study in the field of anesthesiology and pain.
    Biocic M; Fidahic M; Cikes K; Puljak L
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):597-605. PubMed ID: 31393677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reporting and Handling of Missing Participant Data in Systematic Reviews of Kidney Transplant Studies.
    Budhiraja P; Kalot MA; Alayli AE; Dimassi A; Kaplan B; Chakkera HA; Mustafa RA
    Transplantation; 2021 Aug; 105(8):1708-1717. PubMed ID: 33093406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy.
    Korevaar DA; Salameh JP; Vali Y; Cohen JF; McInnes MDF; Spijker R; Bossuyt PM
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):343-353. PubMed ID: 31981399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.