These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30307030)

  • 21. Cross-notation knowledge of fractions and decimals.
    Braithwaite DW; McMullen J; Hurst MA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Jan; 213():105210. PubMed ID: 34450462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parts and 'holes': gaps in rational number sense among children with vs. without mathematical learning disabilities.
    Mazzocco MM; Devlin KT
    Dev Sci; 2008 Sep; 11(5):681-91. PubMed ID: 18801123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Math anxiety differentially impairs symbolic, but not nonsymbolic, fraction skills across development.
    Starling-Alves I; Wronski MR; Hubbard EM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2022 Mar; 1509(1):113-129. PubMed ID: 34780097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Decimals are not processed automatically, not even as being smaller than one.
    Kallai AY; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):962-75. PubMed ID: 24548326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Magnitude comparison with different types of rational numbers.
    DeWolf M; Grounds MA; Bassok M; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 23750968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement.
    Holloway ID; Ansari D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 May; 103(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 18513738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Symbolic versus non-symbolic training for improving early numeracy in preschoolers at risk of developing difficulties in mathematics.
    Tobia V; Bonifacci P; Marzocchi GM
    Res Dev Disabil; 2021 Apr; 111():103893. PubMed ID: 33582478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A systematic investigation of the link between rational number processing and algebra ability.
    Hurst M; Cordes S
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Feb; 109(1):99-117. PubMed ID: 28240359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Young children's non-numerical ordering ability at the start of formal education longitudinally predicts their symbolic number skills and academic achievement in maths.
    O'Connor PA; Morsanyi K; McCormack T
    Dev Sci; 2018 Sep; 21(5):e12645. PubMed ID: 29372580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Magnitude knowledge: the common core of numerical development.
    Siegler RS
    Dev Sci; 2016 May; 19(3):341-61. PubMed ID: 27074723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neural representations of magnitude for natural and rational numbers.
    DeWolf M; Chiang JN; Bassok M; Holyoak KJ; Monti MM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 141():304-312. PubMed ID: 27474523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Symbolic magnitude processing in elementary school children: A group administered paper-and-pencil measure (SYMP Test).
    Brankaer C; Ghesquière P; De Smedt B
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1361-1373. PubMed ID: 27553484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Consequences of Individual Differences in Children's Formal Understanding of Mathematical Equivalence.
    McNeil NM; Hornburg CB; Devlin BL; Carrazza C; McKeever MO
    Child Dev; 2019 May; 90(3):940-956. PubMed ID: 28902386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cognitive predictors of children's development in mathematics achievement: A latent growth modeling approach.
    Xenidou-Dervou I; Van Luit JEH; Kroesbergen EH; Friso-van den Bos I; Jonkman LM; van der Schoot M; van Lieshout ECDM
    Dev Sci; 2018 Nov; 21(6):e12671. PubMed ID: 29691952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Early neural markers for individual difference in mathematical achievement determined from rational number processing.
    Lin P; Zhou X; Zang S; Zhu Y; Zhang L; Bai Y; Wang H
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Mar; 181():108493. PubMed ID: 36707024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The growth rates of dot enumeration ability predict mathematics achievements: A 5-year longitudinal study.
    Liu Y; Wong TT
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2020 Sep; 90(3):604-617. PubMed ID: 31513291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How do people choose among rational number notations?
    Tian J; Braithwaite DW; Siegler RS
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Dec; 123():101333. PubMed ID: 32791362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Kindergartners' fluent processing of symbolic numerical magnitude is predicted by their cardinal knowledge and implicit understanding of arithmetic 2years earlier.
    Moore AM; vanMarle K; Geary DC
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Oct; 150():31-47. PubMed ID: 27236038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conceptual and procedural distinctions between fractions and decimals: A cross-national comparison.
    Lee HS; DeWolf M; Bassok M; Holyoak KJ
    Cognition; 2016 Feb; 147():57-69. PubMed ID: 26615331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Children's mapping between non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitudes and its association with timed and untimed tests of mathematics achievement.
    Brankaer C; Ghesquière P; De Smedt B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93565. PubMed ID: 24699664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.