These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30307053)

  • 21. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
    Walker A; Nixon J
    J Wound Care; 2004 Mar; 13(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 15045804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In response to Porter S. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 60 (1), 79-86.
    Rolfe G
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(1):108-9. PubMed ID: 17824944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence-based practice in action: the review process.
    Foster RL
    J Spec Pediatr Nurs; 2003; 8(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12715400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A re-consideration of what constitutes "evidence" in the healthcare professions.
    Pearson A; Wiechula R; Court A; Lockwood C
    Nurs Sci Q; 2007 Jan; 20(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17202521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. CONSORT 2010.
    Lancet; 2010 Apr; 375(9721):1136. PubMed ID: 20338630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of qualitative research in evidence based practice.
    Madjar I; Taylor B; Lawler J
    Collegian; 2002 Oct; 9(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 12539920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do overly complex reporting guidelines remove the focus from good clinical trials?
    Howick J; Webster R; Knottnerus JA; Moher D
    BMJ; 2021 Aug; 374():n1793. PubMed ID: 34400403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Publication guidelines need widespread adoption.
    Larson EL; Cortazal M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 65(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 22000815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Thinking both inside and outside the box on measurement articles.
    Froman RD; Schmitt MH
    Res Nurs Health; 2003 Oct; 26(5):335-6. PubMed ID: 14579254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Appraising the quality of mixed methods research in nursing: A qualitative case study of nurse researchers' views.
    Fàbregues S; Paré MH
    Nurs Inq; 2018 Oct; 25(4):e12247. PubMed ID: 29927008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CONSORT 2010 changes and testing blindness in RCTs.
    Schulz KF; Altman DG; Moher D; Fergusson D
    Lancet; 2010 Apr; 375(9721):1144-6. PubMed ID: 20338625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Research Excellence Framework (REF): a major impediment to free and informed debate?
    Nolan M; Ingleton C; Hayter M
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Apr; 45(4):487-8. PubMed ID: 18329454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Randomized, controlled trials: Gold or bronze?
    Cheng Hy
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2006 Nov; 7(9):611-2. PubMed ID: 17095430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methods for Our Madness.
    Pickler RH
    Nurs Res; 2021 May-Jun 01; 70(3):163-164. PubMed ID: 33891381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rigor in cross-cultural nursing research.
    Im EO; Page R; Lin LC; Tsai HM; Cheng CY
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Nov; 41(8):891-9. PubMed ID: 15476762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Research approaches: likenesses and differences.
    Parse RR
    Nurs Sci Q; 2003 Jan; 16(1):5. PubMed ID: 12593305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. SPIRIT extension and elaboration for n-of-1 trials: SPENT 2019 checklist.
    Porcino AJ; Shamseer L; Chan AW; Kravitz RL; Orkin A; Punja S; Ravaud P; Schmid CH; Vohra S;
    BMJ; 2020 Feb; 368():m122. PubMed ID: 32107202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing the success of masking in acupuncture trials: further insight.
    Berger VW
    Chin J Integr Med; 2011 Jul; 17(7):546. PubMed ID: 21725882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Observational studies versus RCTs: what about socioeconomic factors?
    Rosén M; Axelsson S; Lindblom J
    Lancet; 2009 Jun; 373(9680):2026. PubMed ID: 19524779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Further assessment of a method to estimate reliability and validity of qualitative research findings.
    Hinds PS; Scandrett-Hibden S; McAulay LS
    J Adv Nurs; 1990 Apr; 15(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 2341688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.