164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30307478)
1. Bone Marrow Biopsy Needle Type Affects Core Biopsy Specimen Length and Quality and Aspirate Hemodilution.
Brestoff JR; Toland A; Afaneh K; Qavi AJ; Press B; Westervelt P; Kreisel F; Hassan A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jan; 151(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 30307478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical experience with a new specimen capturing bone marrow biopsy needle.
Goldenberg AS; Tiesinga JJ
Am J Hematol; 2001 Nov; 68(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 11754401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone marrow biopsies performed by both the powered OnControl drill device and the Jamshidi needle produce adequate specimens.
Jain S; Enzerra M; Mehta RS; Smith R; Djokic M
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Jun; 70(6):541-543. PubMed ID: 28062659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone marrow aspiration before bone marrow core biopsy using the same bone marrow biopsy needle: a good or bad practice?
Islam A
J Clin Pathol; 2007 Feb; 60(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 16751305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of feline core bone marrow biopsies from different sites using 2 techniques and needles.
Abrams-Ogg AC; Defarges A; Bienzle D
Vet Clin Pathol; 2014 Mar; 43(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 24471813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of the Use of a Mallet during Bone Marrow Biopsy Collection on Specimen Quality: A Quality Improvement Project.
Mauzo SH; Golardi N; Baxter AJ; Sultana S; Nguyen ND; Zhang R; Kott MM; Zvavanjanja RC; Chen L
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2018 Jul; 48(4):517-521. PubMed ID: 30143496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between 1-needle technique versus 2-needle technique for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy procedures.
Al-Ibraheemi A; Pham T; Chen L; Syklawer E; Quesada A; Wahed A; Nedelcu E; Nguyen AN
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 137(7):974-8. PubMed ID: 23808470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the bone marrow trephine sample quality between OnControl drill system and the Jamshidi needle.
Forwood KM; Lee E; Crispin PJ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Jun; 41(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 30779423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adequacy of powered vs manual bone marrow biopsy specimens: a retrospective review of sequential marrow aspirates and biopsies in 68 patients.
Lynch DW; Stauffer SL; Rosenthal NS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Apr; 143(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 25780005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revisiting Bone Marrow Core Biopsy Adequacy Criteria in the Era of Extensive Ancillary Testing.
O'Neill SS; Wong TC; Parris J; Chao HH; Mathews SP; Rollins-Raval MA; Fedoriw Y
Clin Lab; 2019 Sep; 65(9):. PubMed ID: 31532106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of canine core bone marrow biopsies from multiple sites using different techniques and needles.
Abrams-Ogg AC; Defarges A; Foster RA; Bienzle D
Vet Clin Pathol; 2012 Jun; 41(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 22486437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normalization of bone marrow aspirates for hemodilution in flow cytometric analyses.
Loken MR; Chu SC; Fritschle W; Kalnoski M; Wells DA
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2009 Jan; 76(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 18548614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of a combined aspiration and core biopsy technique on quality of core bone marrow specimens.
Reeder JP; Hawkins EC; Cora MC; Marks SL; Grindem CB
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2013; 49(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 23148134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using a powered bone marrow biopsy system results in shorter procedures, causes less residual pain to adult patients, and yields larger specimens.
Berenson JR; Yellin O; Blumenstein B; Bojanower D; Croopnick J; Aboulafia D; Upadhyaya G; Spadaccini C
Diagn Pathol; 2011 Mar; 6():23. PubMed ID: 21429220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone marrow aspirate and biopsy: a pathologist's perspective. II. interpretation of the bone marrow aspirate and biopsy.
Riley RS; Williams D; Ross M; Zhao S; Chesney A; Clark BD; Ben-Ezra JM
J Clin Lab Anal; 2009; 23(5):259-307. PubMed ID: 19774631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Indications for bone marrow biopsy in adults].
van Marion AM; Lokhorst HM; van den Tweel JG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Feb; 149(6):283-8. PubMed ID: 15730034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Failed or inadequate bone marrow aspiration: a fast, simple and cost-effective method to produce a cell suspension from a core biopsy specimen.
Novotny JR; Schmücker U; Staats B; Dührsen U
Clin Lab Haematol; 2005 Feb; 27(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 15686505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of the bone marrow by the volumetric method, particle smears, and biopsies in pediatric disorders.
Ozkaynak MF; Scribano P; Gomperts E; Izadi P; Millin R; Isaacs H; Ettinger LJ
Am J Hematol; 1988 Nov; 29(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 3189309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fundamentals of bone marrow examination.
Hyun BH; Stevenson AJ; Hanau CA
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1994 Aug; 8(4):651-63. PubMed ID: 7525532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
