These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30309774)

  • 1. Assessment of subjective refraction with a clinical adaptive optics visual simulator.
    Hervella L; Villegas EA; Prieto PM; Artal P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jan; 45(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 30309774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
    Tabernero J; Otero C; Pardhan S
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):23. PubMed ID: 32832229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of trifocal intraocular lenses on standard autorefraction and aberrometer-based autorefraction.
    Garzón N; García-Montero M; López-Artero E; Poyales F; Albarrán-Diego C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1265-1274. PubMed ID: 31326229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-assessment of refractive errors using a simple optical approach.
    Leube A; Kraft C; Ohlendorf A; Wahl S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 May; 101(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 29356102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement between refractive and corneal astigmatism in pseudophakic eyes.
    Tejedor J; Guirao A
    Cornea; 2013 Jun; 32(6):783-90. PubMed ID: 23132451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of wavefront aberrometer refraction vs manifest refraction in cataract patients: impact of age, ametropia and visual function.
    Huelle JO; Katz T; Draeger J; Pahlitzsch M; Druchkiv V; Steinberg J; Richard G; Linke SJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Apr; 251(4):1163-73. PubMed ID: 23292274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
    Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability of aberrometric measurements with a new instrument for vision analysis based on adaptive optics.
    Otero C; Vilaseca M; Arjona M; Martínez-Roda JA; Pujol J
    J Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 31(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 25751836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of an Affordable Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Rubio M; Hernández CS; Seco E; Perez-Merino P; Casares I; Dave SR; Lim D; Durr NJ; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):726-732. PubMed ID: 31592955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability of a Commercially Available Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Aberrometer in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Shetty R; Kochar S; Grover T; Khamar P; Kusumgar P; Sainani K; Sinha Roy A
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Nov; 33(11):769-772. PubMed ID: 29117417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraocular lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: corrective algorithm for corneal power estimation.
    Jin H; Holzer MP; Rabsilber T; Borkenstein AF; Limberger IJ; Guo H; Auffarth GU
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 20117710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refractive accuracy with light-adjustable intraocular lenses.
    Villegas EA; Alcon E; Rubio E; Marín JM; Artal P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1075-84.e2. PubMed ID: 24957429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a Portable Wavefront Aberrometer for Community Screening Refraction in the Elderly.
    Plum W; Varadaraj V; Dosto N; Thompson SL; Gajwani P; Friedman DS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Mar; 98(3):289-294. PubMed ID: 33633020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA; Campbell CE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparison between Automated Subjective Refraction and Traditional Subjective Refraction in Keratoconus Patients.
    Carracedo G; Carpena-Torres C; Pastrana C; Privado-Aroco A; Serramito M; Espinosa-Vidal TM; Rodríguez-Lafora M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jun; 98(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 34081650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agreement and variability of subjective refraction, autorefraction, and wavefront aberrometry in pseudophakic patients.
    Ruiss M; Findl O; Draschl P; Harrer-Seely A; Hirnschall N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 34292891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical behavior of the eye implanted with extreme intraocular lens powers.
    Oliveira RF; Salerno LC; Mimouni M; Plaza-Puche AB; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1113-1118. PubMed ID: 31126783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of an Independent Web-Based Tool for Measuring Visual Acuity and Refractive Error (the Manifest versus Online Refractive Evaluation Trial): Prospective Open-Label Noninferiority Clinical Trial.
    Wisse RPL; Muijzer MB; Cassano F; Godefrooij DA; Prevoo YFDM; Soeters N
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Nov; 21(11):e14808. PubMed ID: 31702560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The child self-refraction study results from urban Chinese children in Guangzhou.
    He M; Congdon N; MacKenzie G; Zeng Y; Silver JD; Ellwein L
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Jun; 118(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21232802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.