These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30309858)

  • 21. Generating Full-Field Digital Mammogram From Digitized Screen-Film Mammogram for Breast Cancer Screening With High-Resolution Generative Adversarial Network.
    Zhou Y; Wei J; Wu D; Zhang Y
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():868257. PubMed ID: 35574397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Screening Mammography Findings From One Standard Projection Only in the Era of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Cohen EO; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Mayo RC; Leung JWT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):445-451. PubMed ID: 29792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deep learning networks find unique mammographic differences in previous negative mammograms between interval and screen-detected cancers: a case-case study.
    Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
    Cancer Imaging; 2019 Jun; 19(1):41. PubMed ID: 31228956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reduction of false-positive recalls using a computerized mammographic image feature analysis scheme.
    Tan M; Pu J; Zheng B
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4357-73. PubMed ID: 25029964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Re-attendance at biennial screening mammography following a repeated false positive recall.
    Klompenhouwer EG; Duijm LE; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Venderink D; Broeders MJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jun; 145(2):429-37. PubMed ID: 24748569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
    Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast cancer diagnosis from contrast-enhanced mammography using multi-feature fusion neural network.
    Qian N; Jiang W; Guo Y; Zhu J; Qiu J; Yu H; Huang X
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):917-927. PubMed ID: 37610440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving breast mass classification by shared data with domain transformation using a generative adversarial network.
    Muramatsu C; Nishio M; Goto T; Oiwa M; Morita T; Yakami M; Kubo T; Togashi K; Fujita H
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 Apr; 119():103698. PubMed ID: 32339129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Deep learning for detection of iso-dense, obscure masses in mammographically dense breasts.
    Rangarajan K; Aggarwal P; Gupta DK; Dhanakshirur R; Baby A; Pal C; Gupta AK; Hari S; Banerjee S; Arora C
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; 33(11):8112-8121. PubMed ID: 37209125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
    Tan M; Pu J; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Deep-Learning-Based Semantic Labeling for 2D Mammography and Comparison of Complexity for Machine Learning Tasks.
    Yi PH; Lin A; Wei J; Yu AC; Sair HI; Hui FK; Hager GD; Harvey SC
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31197559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors Impacting False Positive Recall in Screening Mammography.
    Honig EL; Mullen LA; Amir T; Alvin MD; Jones MK; Ambinder EB; Falomo ET; Harvey SC
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):1505-1512. PubMed ID: 30772138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Distinction between benign and malignant breast masses at breast ultrasound using deep learning method with convolutional neural network.
    Fujioka T; Kubota K; Mori M; Kikuchi Y; Katsuta L; Kasahara M; Oda G; Ishiba T; Nakagawa T; Tateishi U
    Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 37(6):466-472. PubMed ID: 30888570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
    Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
    Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
    Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Deep learning for mass detection in Full Field Digital Mammograms.
    Agarwal R; Díaz O; Yap MH; Lladó X; Martí R
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 Jun; 121():103774. PubMed ID: 32339095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography.
    Cole EB; Toledano AY; Lundqvist M; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):916-22. PubMed ID: 22537503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset.
    Li H; Giger ML; Yuan Y; Chen W; Horsch K; Lan L; Jamieson AR; Sennett CA; Jansen SA
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Nov; 15(11):1437-45. PubMed ID: 18995194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.