175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30310116)
1. Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer remains underutilized in Germany despite its nationwide application over the last decade.
Ghadban T; Reeh M; Bockhorn M; Heumann A; Grotelueschen R; Bachmann K; Izbicki JR; Perez DR
Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):15146. PubMed ID: 30310116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disparities in the use of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease.
Robinson CN; Balentine CJ; Sansgiry S; Berger DH
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):897-903; discussion 903-4. PubMed ID: 22411487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting the selection of minimally invasive surgery for stage 0/I colorectal cancer.
Kim DH; Kim IY; Kim BR; Kim YW
Int J Surg; 2015 Apr; 16(Pt A):44-48. PubMed ID: 25749437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.
Disbrow DE; Pannell SM; Shanker BA; Albright J; Wu J; Bastawrous A; Soliman M; Ferraro J; Cleary RK
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):767-778. PubMed ID: 29054345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors Associated With Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Emergency Settings.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens JM; Merchea A; Crandall M; Colibaseanu DT
J Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 243():75-82. PubMed ID: 31158727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uptake of minimally invasive surgery for early stage colorectal cancer and its effect on survival: A population-based study.
Akhtar-Danesh N; Logie K; Akhtar-Danesh GG; Finley C
Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 35():540-546. PubMed ID: 33186830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disparities in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Florida.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens JM; Merchea A; Kasi PM; Crandall M; Colibaseanu DT
Am J Surg; 2019 Aug; 218(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 30503514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results.
Marusch F; Gastinger I; Schneider C; Scheidbach H; Konradt J; Bruch HP; Köhler L; Bärlehner E; Köckerling F;
Surg Endosc; 2001 Feb; 15(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 11285950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes.
Warps AK; Saraste D; Westerterp M; Detering R; Sjövall A; Martling A; Dekker JWT; Tollenaar RAEM; Matthiessen P; Tanis PJ;
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5986-6001. PubMed ID: 35258664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Obese patients benefit from minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.
Balentine CJ; Marshall C; Robinson C; Wilks J; Anaya D; Albo D; Berger DH
J Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 163(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 20538294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association of hospital factors and socioeconomic status with the utilization of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer over a decade.
Patel R; Pant K; Patel KS; Merchant AM; Alvarez-Downing MM
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3750-3762. PubMed ID: 34462866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open versus minimally invasive surgical approaches in pediatric urology: Trends in utilization and complications.
Tejwani R; Young BJ; Wang HS; Wolf S; Purves JT; Wiener JS; Routh JC
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Jun; 13(3):283.e1-283.e9. PubMed ID: 28344019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older.
Kwon IG; Cho I; Guner A; Kim HI; Noh SH; Hyung WJ
Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2321-30. PubMed ID: 25480603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recent advances in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.
Wichmann MW; Meyer G; Angele MK; Schildberg FW; Rau HG
Onkologie; 2002 Aug; 25(4):318-23. PubMed ID: 12232482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years.
Schneider MA; Gero D; Müller M; Horisberger K; Rickenbacher A; Turina M
Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6227-6243. PubMed ID: 33206242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolving application of minimally invasive cancer operations at a tertiary cancer center.
Selby LV; DeMatteo RP; Tholey RM; Jarnagin WR; Garcia-Aguilar J; Strombom PD; Allen PJ; Kingham TP; Weiser MR; Brennan MF; Strong VE
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(4):365-370. PubMed ID: 28299807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Insurance status does not affect short-term outcomes after oncological colorectal surgery in Europe, but influences the use of minimally invasive techniques: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Schneider MA; Rickenbacher A; Frick L; Cabalzar-Wondberg D; Käser S; Clavien PA; Turina M
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Nov; 403(7):863-872. PubMed ID: 30361827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive approach to colorectal cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
Bissolati M; Orsenigo E; Staudacher C
Updates Surg; 2016 Mar; 68(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 26980091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
