These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30310471)
21. Magnetic Resonance for Noninvasive Detection of Microcirculatory Disease Associated With Allograft Vasculopathy: Intracoronary Measurement Validation. Mirelis JG; García-Pavía P; Cavero MA; González-López E; Echavarria-Pinto M; Pastrana M; Segovia J; Oteo JF; Alonso-Pulpón L; Escaned J Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2015 Jul; 68(7):571-8. PubMed ID: 25522835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of Local Myocardial Damage on Index of Microcirculatory Resistance and Fractional Flow Reserve in Target and Nontarget Vascular Territories in a Porcine Microvascular Injury Model. Lee JM; Kim HK; Lim KS; Park JK; Choi KH; Park J; Hwang D; Rhee TM; Yang JH; Shin ES; Nam CW; Doh JH; Hahn JY; Koo BK; Jeong MH JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Apr; 11(8):717-724. PubMed ID: 29605246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Similarity and Difference of Resting Distal to Aortic Coronary Pressure and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio. Lee JM; Park J; Hwang D; Kim CH; Choi KH; Rhee TM; Tong Y; Park JJ; Shin ES; Nam CW; Doh JH; Koo BK J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 70(17):2114-2123. PubMed ID: 29050558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Physiologic mechanism of discordance between instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve: Insight from Lee JM; Hwang D; Park J; Tong Y; Koo BK Int J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 243():91-94. PubMed ID: 28600102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Meuwissen M; Chamuleau SA; Siebes M; Schotborgh CE; Koch KT; de Winter RJ; Bax M; de Jong A; Spaan JA; Piek JJ Circulation; 2001 Jan; 103(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 11208673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic implications of resting distal coronary-to-aortic pressure ratio compared with fractional flow reserve: a 10-year follow-up study after deferral of revascularisation. Wijntjens GWM; van de Hoef TP; Meuwissen M; Echavarría-Pinto M; Murai T; Stegehuis VE; Koch KT; Chamuleau SA; Voskuil M; de Winter RJ; Tijssen JGP; Piek JJ Neth Heart J; 2020 Feb; 28(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 31965471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Coronary pressure and flow relationships in humans: phasic analysis of normal and pathological vessels and the implications for stenosis assessment: a report from the Iberian-Dutch-English (IDEAL) collaborators. Nijjer SS; de Waard GA; Sen S; van de Hoef TP; Petraco R; Echavarría-Pinto M; van Lavieren MA; Meuwissen M; Danad I; Knaapen P; Escaned J; Piek JJ; Davies JE; van Royen N Eur Heart J; 2016 Jul; 37(26):2069-80. PubMed ID: 26612582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Coronary Flow Reserve and Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis. Lee JM; Jung JH; Hwang D; Park J; Fan Y; Na SH; Doh JH; Nam CW; Shin ES; Koo BK J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Mar; 67(10):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 26965536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio to Assess Coronary Stenosis Relevance: Results of ADVISE II International, Multicenter Study (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation II). Escaned J; Echavarría-Pinto M; Garcia-Garcia HM; van de Hoef TP; de Vries T; Kaul P; Raveendran G; Altman JD; Kurz HI; Brechtken J; Tulli M; Von Birgelen C; Schneider JE; Khashaba AA; Jeremias A; Baucum J; Moreno R; Meuwissen M; Mishkel G; van Geuns RJ; Levite H; Lopez-Palop R; Mayhew M; Serruys PW; Samady H; Piek JJ; Lerman A; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 May; 8(6):824-833. PubMed ID: 25999106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of microcirculatory remodeling with intracoronary flow velocity and pressure measurements: validation with endomyocardial sampling in cardiac allografts. Escaned J; Flores A; García-Pavía P; Segovia J; Jimenez J; Aragoncillo P; Salas C; Alfonso F; Hernández R; Angiolillo DJ; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Bañuelos C; Alonso-Pulpón L; Macaya C Circulation; 2009 Oct; 120(16):1561-8. PubMed ID: 19805652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Resting Pd/Pa and haemodynamic relevance of coronary stenosis as evaluated by fractional flow reserve. De Luca G; Verdoia M; Barbieri L; Marino P; Suryapranata H Coron Artery Dis; 2018 Mar; 29(2):138-144. PubMed ID: 29028737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diastolic fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of moderate coronary artery stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve. Abe M; Tomiyama H; Yoshida H; Doba N Circulation; 2000 Nov; 102(19):2365-70. PubMed ID: 11067790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic performance of pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve. Kolli KK; Arif I; Peelukhana SV; Succop P; Back LH; Helmy TA; Leesar MA; Effat MA; Banerjee RK J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 24791716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of coronary angiography and intracoronary imaging with fractional flow reserve for coronary artery disease evaluation: An anatomical-functional mismatch. Adjedj J; Stoyanov N; Muller O Anatol J Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 20(3):182-189. PubMed ID: 30152800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The prognostic value of combined intracoronary pressure and blood flow velocity measurements after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention. Meuwissen M; Chamuleau SA; Siebes M; de Winter RJ; Koch KT; Dijksman LM; van den Berg AJ; Tijssen JG; Spaan JA; Piek JJ Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Feb; 71(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. What can intracoronary pressure measurements tell us about flow reserve? Pressure-Bounded coronary flow reserve and example application to the randomized DEFER trial. Zimmermann FM; Pijls NHJ; De Bruyne B; Bech GJ; van Schaardenburgh P; Kirkeeide RL; Gould KL; Johnson NP Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(6):917-925. PubMed ID: 28296167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical and physiological outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with serial stenoses within one coronary artery. Kim HL; Koo BK; Nam CW; Doh JH; Kim JH; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Cho YS; Youn TJ; Kim SH; Chae IH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(10):1013-8. PubMed ID: 23078728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of visual-functional mismatch on coronary flow profiles after percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score-matched analysis. Hoshino M; Yonetsu T; Murai T; Kanaji Y; Usui E; Hada M; Hamaya R; Kanno Y; Lee T; Kakuta T Heart Vessels; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1129-1138. PubMed ID: 29627899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of standard- and high-dose intracoronary adenosine for the measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR). Röther J; Achenbach S; Tröbs M; Blachutzik F; Nef H; Marwan M; Schlundt C Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 105(12):1003-1010. PubMed ID: 27307094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]