368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30311552)
1. Effects of Slow- and Fast-Acting Compression on Hearing-Impaired Listeners' Consonant-Vowel Identification in Interrupted Noise.
Kowalewski B; Zaar J; Fereczkowski M; MacDonald EN; Strelcyk O; May T; Dau T
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518800870. PubMed ID: 30311552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.
Davies-Venn E; Souza P; Brennan M; Stecker GC
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 19633563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of Instantaneous Compression on Recognition of Speech in Noise with Temporal Dips.
Rasetshwane DM; Raybine DA; Kopun JG; Gorga MP; Neely ST
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 30461387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Hearing Loss and Fast-Acting Compression on Amplitude Modulation Perception and Speech Intelligibility.
Wiinberg A; Jepsen ML; Epp B; Dau T
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 29668566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using multichannel wide-dynamic range compression in severely hearing-impaired listeners: effects on speech recognition and quality.
Souza PE; Jenstad LM; Folino R
Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 15809540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test.
Scheidiger C; Allen JB; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1739. PubMed ID: 28372055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
Chen F; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual Evaluation of Signal-to-Noise-Ratio-Aware Dynamic Range Compression in Hearing Aids.
Kowalewski B; Dau T; May T
Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520930531. PubMed ID: 32573373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving speech audibility with wide dynamic range compression in listeners with severe sensorineural loss.
Souza PE; Bishop RD
Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 10613384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
Shi LF; Doherty KA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
Kates JM
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.
Woods DL; Arbogast T; Doss Z; Younus M; Herron TJ; Yund EW
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0114922. PubMed ID: 25730423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring the limits of frequency lowering.
Souza PE; Arehart KH; Kates JM; Croghan NB; Gehani N
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1349-63. PubMed ID: 23785188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
