These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30314615)

  • 1. Unique Review Criteria and Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers: Analysis of PCORI's Approach to Research Funding.
    Forsythe LP; Frank LB; Tafari AT; Cohen SS; Lauer M; Clauser S; Goertz C; Schrandt S
    Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1152-1160. PubMed ID: 30314615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Researchers, Patients, and Stakeholders Evaluating Comparative-Effectiveness Research: A Mixed-Methods Study of the PCORI Reviewer Experience.
    Forsythe LP; Frank LB; Hemphill R; Tafari AT; Szydlowski V; Lauer M; Goertz C; Clauser S
    Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1161-1167. PubMed ID: 30314616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Engaging patients and stakeholders in research proposal review: the patient-centered outcomes research institute.
    Fleurence RL; Forsythe LP; Lauer M; Rotter J; Ioannidis JP; Beal A; Frank L; Selby JV
    Ann Intern Med; 2014 Jul; 161(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 25023251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute.
    Frank L; Forsythe L; Ellis L; Schrandt S; Sheridan S; Gerson J; Konopka K; Daugherty S
    Qual Life Res; 2015 May; 24(5):1033-41. PubMed ID: 25560774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research.
    Sheridan S; Schrandt S; Forsythe L; Hilliard TS; Paez KA;
    Ann Fam Med; 2017 Mar; 15(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 28289118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
    Forsythe L; Heckert A; Margolis MK; Schrandt S; Frank L
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Jan; 27(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 28500572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Training patients to review scientific reports for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: an observational study.
    Ivlev I; Vander Ley KJ; Wiedrick J; Lesley K; Forester A; Webb R; Broitman M; Eden KB
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e028732. PubMed ID: 31542741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The patient-centered outcomes research institute: research done differently.
    Newhouse R; Barksdale DJ; Miller JA
    Nurs Res; 2015; 64(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 25502063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Criterion Scores Predict the Overall Impact Score and Funding Outcomes for National Institutes of Health Peer-Reviewed Applications.
    Eblen MK; Wagner RM; RoyChowdhury D; Patel KC; Pearson K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0155060. PubMed ID: 27249058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics of Early Recipients of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Funding.
    Mazur S; Bazemore A; Merenstein D
    Acad Med; 2016 Apr; 91(4):491-6. PubMed ID: 26862840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary Care Research in the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's Portfolio.
    Selby JV; Slutsky JR
    Acad Med; 2016 Apr; 91(4):453-4. PubMed ID: 26862842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How different is research done by the Patient-centered Outcomes Research Institute, and what difference does it make?
    Luce BR; Simeone JC
    J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Oct; 8(14):1239-1251. PubMed ID: 31436471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Show me the money! An analysis of underserved stakeholders' funding priorities in Patient Centered Outcomes Research domains.
    Cargill SS; Baker LL; Goold SD
    J Comp Eff Res; 2017 Jul; 6(5):449-459. PubMed ID: 28686060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals.
    Fogelholm M; Leppinen S; Auvinen A; Raitanen J; Nuutinen A; Väänänen K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 21831594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study.
    Barnett AG; Glisson SR; Gallo S
    F1000Res; 2018; 7():1030. PubMed ID: 30345025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From Principles to Practice: Real-World Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in Breast Cancer Research.
    Greene SM; Brandzel S; Wernli KJ
    Perm J; 2018; 22():17-232. PubMed ID: 29911967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lessons on Patient and Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Pipeline to Proposal Awards.
    Wennerstrom A; Springgate BF; Jones F; Meyers D; Henderson N; Brown A; Niyogi A; Martin D; Smith J; Kirkland AL; Jones L; Norris KC
    Ethn Dis; 2018; 28(Suppl 2):303-310. PubMed ID: 30202182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Parr AT; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(3):E249-82. PubMed ID: 21587337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications.
    Pier EL; Brauer M; Filut A; Kaatz A; Raclaw J; Nathan MJ; Ford CE; Carnes M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(12):2952-2957. PubMed ID: 29507248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of stakeholder views on peer review of NIHR applications for funding: a qualitative study.
    Turner S; Bull A; Chinnery F; Hinks J; Mcardle N; Moran R; Payne H; Woodford Guegan E; Worswick L; Wyatt JC
    BMJ Open; 2018 Dec; 8(12):e022548. PubMed ID: 30552252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.