65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30315976)
21. Surgical preference regarding different materials for custom-made allograft cranioplasty in patients with calvarial defects: Results from an internal audit covering the last 20 years.
Ganau M; Cebula H; Fricia M; Zaed I; Todeschi J; Scibilia A; Gallinaro P; Coca A; Chaussemy D; Ollivier I; Ligarotti GKI; des Neiges Santin M; Proust F; Chibbaro S
J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 74():98-103. PubMed ID: 32033859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-Term Follow-Up of Custom-Made Porous Hydroxyapatite Cranioplasties: Analysis of Infections in Adult and Pediatric Patients.
Mannella FC; Faedo F; Fumagalli M; Norata GD; Zaed I; Servadei F
J Clin Med; 2024 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38398446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Acceptable durability of split inner table graft for the reconstruction of a bone defect in pterional craniotomies: a case series.
Kweon GY; Park J; Son W
Front Surg; 2023; 10():1213648. PubMed ID: 37520153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Considerations regarding FACE-Q® craniofacial as a newly developed QoL-PROMs questionnaire suitable for paediatric and adult cranioplasty patients.
Ganau M; Calisto A; Thomas GPL
Neurosurg Rev; 2023 Jun; 46(1):141. PubMed ID: 37335415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Management of infected hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: Is salvage feasible?
Di Rienzo A; Colasanti R; Dobran M; Formica F; Della Costanza M; Carrassi E; Aiudi D; Iacoangeli M
Brain Spine; 2022; 2():100907. PubMed ID: 36248178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Subgaleal Effusion and Brain Midline Shift After Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Study Between Polyetheretherketone Cranioplasty and Titanium Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy.
Ji T; Yao P; Zeng Y; Qian Z; Wang K; Gao L
Front Surg; 2022; 9():923987. PubMed ID: 35937601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A scoping review on the challenges, improvement programs, and relevant output metrics for neurotrauma services in major trauma centers.
Dasic D; Morgan L; Panezai A; Syrmos N; Ligarotti GKI; Zaed I; Chibbaro S; Khan T; Prisco L; Ganau M
Surg Neurol Int; 2022; 13():171. PubMed ID: 35509585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.
Kroczek K; Turek P; Mazur D; Szczygielski J; Filip D; Brodowski R; Balawender K; Przeszłowski Ł; Lewandowski B; Orkisz S; Mazur A; Budzik G; Cebulski J; Oleksy M
Polymers (Basel); 2022 Apr; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 35458276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Novel Titanium Cranioplasty Technique of Marking the Coronal and Squamosoparietal Sutures in Three-Dimensional Titanium Mesh as Anatomical Positioning Markers to Increase the Surgical Accuracy and Reduce Postoperative Complications.
Xie BS; Wang FY; Zheng SF; Lin YX; Kang DZ; Fang WH
Front Surg; 2021; 8():754466. PubMed ID: 34970589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Augmented Reality-Assisted Craniotomy for Parasagittal and Convexity En Plaque Meningiomas and Custom-Made Cranio-Plasty: A Preliminary Laboratory Report.
Montemurro N; Condino S; Cattari N; D'Amato R; Ferrari V; Cutolo F
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of two different titanium cranioplasty methods: Custom-made titanium prostheses versus precurved titanium mesh.
Policicchio D; Casu G; Dipellegrini G; Doda A; Muggianu G; Boccaletti R
Surg Neurol Int; 2020; 11():148. PubMed ID: 32637201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fibrous Meningioma with Skull Invasion.
Ichimura S; Takahara K; Fujii K
J Neurosci Rural Pract; 2019 Oct; 10(4):707-710. PubMed ID: 31831993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hydroxyapatite ceramic implants for cranioplasty in children: a retrospective evaluation of clinical outcome and osteointegration.
Spennato P; Canella V; Aliberti F; Russo C; Ruggiero C; Nataloni A; Lombardo M; Cinalli G
Childs Nerv Syst; 2020 Mar; 36(3):551-558. PubMed ID: 31786632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Complications of skull reconstruction after decompressive craniectomy.
Herteleer M; Ectors N; Duflou J; Van Calenbergh F
Acta Chir Belg; 2017 Jun; 117(3):149-156. PubMed ID: 27931166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Management of decompressive craniectomy defects: modern military treatment strategies.
Tantawi D; Armonda R; Valerio I; Kumar AR
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2042-5. PubMed ID: 23154344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Independent Factors Affecting Postoperative Complication Rates After Custom-Made Porous Hydroxyapatite Cranioplasty: A Single-Center Review of 109 Cases.
Still M; Kane A; Roux A; Zanello M; Dezamis E; Parraga E; Sauvageon X; Meder JF; Pallud J
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e1232-e1244. PubMed ID: 29625304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. From Reparative Surgery to Regenerative Surgery: State of the Art of Porous Hydroxyapatite in Cranioplasty.
Zaed I; Cardia A; Stefini R
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 May; 23(10):. PubMed ID: 35628245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outcomes of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in the pediatric population.
Rocque BG; Amancherla K; Lew SM; Lam S
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2013 Aug; 12(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 23790219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cranioplasty with Porous Hydroxyapatite Custom-Made Bone Flap: Results from a Multicenter Study Enrolling 149 Patients Over 15 Years.
Fricia M; Nicolosi F; Ganau M; Cebula H; Todeschi J; Santin MDN; Nannavecchia B; Morselli C; Chibbaro S
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jan; 121():160-165. PubMed ID: 30315976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
