These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30316030)

  • 1. Highly Innovative Drug Program in the Czech Republic: Description and Pharmacoeconomic Results-Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analyses.
    Ornstova E; Sebestianova M; Mlcoch T; Lamblova K; Dolezal T
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2018 Sep; 16():92-98. PubMed ID: 30316030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drug Policy in the Czech Republic.
    Skoupá J
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2017 Sep; 13():55-58. PubMed ID: 29073989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cost-effectiveness of new drugs impacts reimbursement decision making but room for improvement].
    Hoomans T; van der Roer N; Severens JL; Delwel GO
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A958. PubMed ID: 20699045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pricing and reimbursement of pharmaceuticals in the Czech Republic and Sweden.
    Davidova J; Praznovcova L; Lundborg CS
    Pharm World Sci; 2008 Jan; 30(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17588212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological quality of economic evaluations of new pharmaceuticals in The Netherlands.
    Hoomans T; Severens JL; van der Roer N; Delwel GO
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Mar; 30(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 22074610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Relevance of pharmacoeconomic analyses to price and reimbursement decisions in Austria].
    Führlinger S
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2006 Dec; 156(23-24):612-8. PubMed ID: 17211765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review of regulatory recommendations for orphan drug submissions in the Netherlands and Scotland: focus on the underlying pharmacoeconomic evaluations.
    Vegter S; Rozenbaum MH; Postema R; Tolley K; Postma MJ
    Clin Ther; 2010 Aug; 32(9):1651-61. PubMed ID: 20974323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Drug Policy in Poland.
    Jahnz-Różyk K; Kawalec P; Malinowski K; Czok K
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2017 Sep; 13():23-26. PubMed ID: 29073983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing patient access to pharmaceuticals in the UK and US.
    Cohen J; Cairns C; Paquette C; Faden L
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2006; 5(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 17132032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Patients with COPD-A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Czech Republic.
    Skoupa J; Kasak V; Klimes J; Valena T
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2018 Sep; 16():112-118. PubMed ID: 30539739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Economic and clinical comparison of atypical depot antipsychotic drugs for treatment of chronic schizophrenia in the Czech Republic.
    Einarson TR; Zilbershtein R; Skoupá J; Veselá S; Garg M; Hemels ME
    J Med Econ; 2013 Sep; 16(9):1089-95. PubMed ID: 23808900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National reimbursement listing determinants of new cancer drugs: a retrospective analysis of 58 cancer treatment appraisals in 2007-2016 in South Korea.
    Kim ES; Kim JA; Lee EK
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Aug; 17(4):401-409. PubMed ID: 28010146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is known about the cost-effectiveness of orphan drugs? Evidence from cost-utility analyses.
    Picavet E; Cassiman D; Simoens S
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2015 Jun; 40(3):304-7. PubMed ID: 25891411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation Process in Ireland.
    McCullagh L; Barry M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Dec; 34(12):1267-1276. PubMed ID: 27473640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid for preventing skeletal-related events in the Czech Republic.
    Cristino J; Finek J; Jandova P; Kolek M; Pásztor B; Giannopoulou C; Qian Y; Brezina T; Lothgren M
    J Med Econ; 2017 Aug; 20(8):799-812. PubMed ID: 28485692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reimbursement of targeted cancer therapies within 3 different European health care systems.
    Mihajlović J; Dolk C; Tolley K; Simoens S; Postma MJ
    Clin Ther; 2015 Feb; 37(2):474-80. PubMed ID: 25638534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using pharmacoeconomic analysis to make drug insurance coverage decisions.
    Anis AH; Rahman T; Schechter MT
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1998 Jan; 13(1 Pt 2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10176146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe.
    Malinowski KP; Kawalec P; Trąbka W; Sowada C; Petrova G; Manova M; Savova A; Draganić P; Slabý J; Männik A; Márky K; Rugaja Z; Gulbinovic J; Tesar T; Paveliu MS
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2020 Oct; 15(1):277. PubMed ID: 33032634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reimbursed Price of Orphan Drugs: Current Strategies and Potential Improvements.
    Mincarone P; Leo CG; Sabina S; Sarriá-Santamera A; Taruscio D; Serrano-Aguilar PG; Kanavos P
    Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 28359063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical assessment of belgian reimbursement dossiers of orphan drugs.
    Denis A; Mergaert L; Fostier C; Cleemput I; Hulstaert F; Simoens S
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Oct; 29(10):883-93. PubMed ID: 21905759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.