These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30317425)

  • 1. Towards standardized patient reported physical function outcome reporting: linking ten commonly used questionnaires to a common metric.
    Oude Voshaar MAH; Vonkeman HE; Courvoisier D; Finckh A; Gossec L; Leung YY; Michaud K; Pinheiro G; Soriano E; Wulfraat N; Zink A; van de Laar MAFJ
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):187-197. PubMed ID: 30317425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishing a Common Metric for Physical Function: Linking the HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF Subscale to PROMIS(®) Physical Function.
    Schalet BD; Revicki DA; Cook KF; Krishnan E; Fries JF; Cella D
    J Gen Intern Med; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1517-23. PubMed ID: 25990189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scale Banking for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures That Measure Functioning in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Daily Activities Metric.
    Prodinger B; Coenen M; Hammond A; Küçükdeveci AA; Tennant A
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2022 Apr; 74(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 33152178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a Standardized Reporting of Outcomes in Hand Osteoarthritis: Developing a Common Metric of Outcome Measures Commonly Used to Assess Functioning.
    Prodinger B; Stamm T; Peterson D; Stucki G; Tennant A;
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2016 Aug; 68(8):1115-27. PubMed ID: 26663476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Common measures or common metrics? the value of IRT-based common metrics.
    Terwee CB
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2023 Nov; 7(1):117. PubMed ID: 37982948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing five depression measures in depressed Chinese patients using item response theory: an examination of item properties, measurement precision and score comparability.
    Zhao Y; Chan W; Lo BC
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):60. PubMed ID: 28372559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Varying the item format improved the range of measurement in patient-reported outcome measures assessing physical function.
    Liegl G; Gandek B; Fischer HF; Bjorner JB; Ware JE; Rose M; Fries JF; Nolte S
    Arthritis Res Ther; 2017 Mar; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 28320462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physical function metric over measure: An illustration with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT).
    Kaat AJ; Schalet BD; Rutsohn J; Jensen RE; Cella D
    Cancer; 2018 Jan; 124(1):153-160. PubMed ID: 28885707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standardization of depression measurement: a common metric was developed for 11 self-report depression measures.
    Wahl I; Löwe B; Bjorner JB; Fischer F; Langs G; Voderholzer U; Aita SA; Bergemann N; Brähler E; Rose M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 67(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 24262771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item parameters of a common metric resulted in similar depression scores compared to independent item response theory model reestimation.
    Liegl G; Wahl I; Berghöfer A; Nolte S; Pieh C; Rose M; Fischer F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Mar; 71():25-34. PubMed ID: 26475569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing.
    Chakravarty EF; Bjorner JB; Fries JF
    J Rheumatol; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1426-31. PubMed ID: 17552069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction.
    Sawatzky R; Russell LB; Sajobi TT; Lix LM; Kopec J; Zumbo BD
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1745-1755. PubMed ID: 28836090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Procedures to develop a computerized adaptive test to assess patient-reported physical functioning.
    McCabe E; Gross DP; Bulut O
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2393-2402. PubMed ID: 29881895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Scores of Patients Undergoing Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
    Jain SS; DeFroda SF; Paxton ES; Green A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Sep; 101(17):1593-1600. PubMed ID: 31483403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asking what matters: The relevance and use of patient-reported outcome measures that were developed without patient involvement.
    Wiering B; de Boer D; Delnoij D
    Health Expect; 2017 Dec; 20(6):1330-1341. PubMed ID: 28675514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating power for clinical trials with Patient Reported Outcomes - using Item Response Theory.
    Hu J; Thompson J; Mudaranthakam DP; Hinton LC; Streeter D; Park M; Terluin B; Gajewski B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 141():141-148. PubMed ID: 34648941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linking Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores from the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) to the PROMIS(®) Global Health Scale.
    Schalet BD; Rothrock NE; Hays RD; Kazis LE; Cook KF; Rutsohn JP; Cella D
    J Gen Intern Med; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1524-30. PubMed ID: 26179820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
    ; Bigouette JP; Owen EC; Lantz BBA; Hoellrich RG; Huston LJ; Haas AK; Allen CR; Anderson AF; Cooper DE; DeBerardino TM; Dunn WR; Mann B; Spindler KP; Stuart MJ; Wright RW; Albright JP; Amendola AN; Andrish JT; Annunziata CC; Arciero RA; Bach BR; Baker CL; Bartolozzi AR; Baumgarten KM; Bechler JR; Berg JH; Bernas GA; Brockmeier SF; Brophy RH; Bush-Joseph CA; Butler JB; Campbell JD; Carey JL; Carpenter JE; Cole BJ; Cooper JM; Cox CL; Creighton RA; Dahm DL; David TS; Flanigan DC; Frederick RW; Ganley TJ; Garofoli EA; Gatt CJ; Gecha SR; Giffin JR; Hame SL; Hannafin JA; Harner CD; Harris NL; Hechtman KS; Hershman EB; Hosea TM; Johnson DC; Johnson TS; Jones MH; Kaeding CC; Kamath GV; Klootwyk TE; Levy BA; Ma CB; Maiers GP; Marx RG; Matava MJ; Mathien GM; McAllister DR; McCarty EC; McCormack RG; Miller BS; Nissen CW; O'Neill DF; Owens BD; Parker RD; Purnell ML; Ramappa AJ; Rauh MA; Rettig AC; Sekiya JK; Shea KG; Sherman OH; Slauterbeck JR; Smith MV; Spang JT; Svoboda SJ; Taft TN; Tenuta JJ; Tingstad EM; Vidal AF; Viskontas DG; White RA; Williams JS; Wolcott ML; Wolf BR; York JJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Jul; 47(9):2056-2066. PubMed ID: 31225999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures used in gout: an evaluation of their content and measurement properties.
    Janssen CA; Oude Voshaar MAH; Ten Klooster PM; Jansen TLTA; Vonkeman HE; van de Laar MAFJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Apr; 17(1):63. PubMed ID: 30975212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT) to the metric of traditional headache scales.
    Bjorner JB; Kosinski M; Ware JE
    Qual Life Res; 2003 Dec; 12(8):981-1002. PubMed ID: 14651417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.