These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30318325)

  • 1. Impact of voxel size and scan time on the accuracy of three-dimensional radiological imaging data from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Dach E; Bergauer B; Seidel A; von Wilmowsky C; Adler W; Lell M; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2190-2196. PubMed ID: 30318325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of different cone beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scan parameters on virtual three-dimensional model accuracy using a highly precise ex vivo evaluation method.
    Matta RE; von Wilmowsky C; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Neukam FW; Adler W; Wichmann M; Bergauer B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 44(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 27017101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Exposure Parameters and Voxel Size for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography on the Image Matching Accuracy with an Optical Dental Scan Image: An In Vitro Study.
    Mai HN; Lee DH
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():6971828. PubMed ID: 34222482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Segmentation process significantly influences the accuracy of 3D surface models derived from cone beam computed tomography.
    Fourie Z; Damstra J; Schepers RH; Gerrits PO; Ren Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e524-30. PubMed ID: 21733649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.
    Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
    Sang YH; Hu HC; Lu SH; Wu YW; Li WR; Tang ZH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(12):1464-70. PubMed ID: 27270544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Head positioning in a cone beam computed tomography unit and the effect on accuracy of the three-dimensional surface mode.
    Stamatakis HC; Steegman R; Dusseldorp J; Ren Y
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2019 Feb; 127(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 30378185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone-beam computed tomography: accuracy of three-dimensional cephalometry analysis and influence of patient scanning position.
    Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco P
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1038-43. PubMed ID: 22777473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and validity of stitching sectional cone beam computed tomographic images.
    Kim MK; Kang SH; Lee EH; Lee SH; Park W
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1071-6. PubMed ID: 22777443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fast three-dimensional superimposition of cone beam computed tomography for orthopaedics and orthognathic surgery evaluation.
    Weissheimer A; Menezes LM; Koerich L; Pham J; Cevidanes LH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 44(9):1188-96. PubMed ID: 25935632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional craniofacial cone-beam CT superimposition method based on voxel registration].
    Zhou GH; Chen L; Sun YY; Ge N; Su L; Bai YX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):475-9. PubMed ID: 27511038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of in vitro mandibular volumetric measurements from CBCT of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings.
    Dong T; Xia L; Cai C; Yuan L; Ye N; Fang B
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):206. PubMed ID: 31484529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of open-source software segmentation and paper-based printed three-dimensional models.
    Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M; Olszewski R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 44(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 26748414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dimensional measurement accuracy of 3-dimensional models from cone beam computed tomography using different voxel sizes.
    Mukhia N; Birur NP; Shubhasini AR; Shubha G; Keerthi G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Sep; 132(3):361-369. PubMed ID: 34246615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy assessment of prototypes produced using multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Primo BT; Presotto AC; de Oliveira HW; Gassen HT; Miguens SA; Silva AN; Hernandez PA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 41(10):1291-5. PubMed ID: 22578568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
    Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy using cone beam CT and multislice CT.
    Vandenberghe B; Luchsinger S; Hostens J; Dhoore E; Jacobs R;
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):466-74. PubMed ID: 22282512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.