These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30320832)

  • 21. Practical quantum key distribution protocol without monitoring signal disturbance.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto Y; Koashi M
    Nature; 2014 May; 509(7501):475-8. PubMed ID: 24848060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biased decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum cryptographic conferencing with finite resources.
    Chen R; Bao W; Zhou C; Li H; Wang Y; Bao H
    Opt Express; 2016 Mar; 24(6):6594-605. PubMed ID: 27136849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detecting a Photon-Number Splitting Attack in Decoy-State Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution via Statistical Hypothesis Testing.
    Chen X; Chen L; Yan Y
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Sep; 24(9):. PubMed ID: 36141118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved statistical fluctuation analysis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with four-intensity decoy-state method.
    Mao CC; Zhou XY; Zhu JR; Zhang CH; Zhang CM; Wang Q
    Opt Express; 2018 May; 26(10):13289-13300. PubMed ID: 29801354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optically injected intensity-stable pulse source for secure quantum key distribution.
    Xie HB; Li Y; Jiang C; Cai WQ; Yin J; Ren JG; Wang XB; Liao SK; Peng CZ
    Opt Express; 2019 Apr; 27(9):12231-12240. PubMed ID: 31052767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with a Passive Decoy-State Method.
    Xue K; Shen Z; Zhao S; Mao Q
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 35626547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Simple security proof of coherent-one-way quantum key distribution.
    Gao RQ; Xie YM; Gu J; Liu WB; Weng CX; Li BH; Yin HL; Chen ZB
    Opt Express; 2022 Jun; 30(13):23783-23795. PubMed ID: 36225053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Security analysis of quantum key distribution on passive optical networks.
    Lim K; Ko H; Suh C; Rhee JK
    Opt Express; 2017 May; 25(10):11894-11909. PubMed ID: 28788747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-distance measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with coherent-state superpositions.
    Yin HL; Cao WF; Fu Y; Tang YL; Liu Y; Chen TY; Chen ZB
    Opt Lett; 2014 Sep; 39(18):5451-4. PubMed ID: 26466295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Experimental demonstration of tomography-based quantum key distribution.
    Wei M; Zhang CH; Li J; Zhu JL; Wang Q
    Opt Lett; 2022 Dec; 47(23):6285-6288. PubMed ID: 37219228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experimental measurement-device-independent type quantum key distribution with flawed and correlated sources.
    Gu J; Cao XY; Fu Y; He ZW; Yin ZJ; Yin HL; Chen ZB
    Sci Bull (Beijing); 2022 Nov; 67(21):2167-2175. PubMed ID: 36545992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantum man-in-the-middle attack on the calibration process of quantum key distribution.
    Fei YY; Meng XD; Gao M; Wang H; Ma Z
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4283. PubMed ID: 29523828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving the performance of reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution with advantage distillation technology.
    Jiang XL; Wang Y; Li JJ; Lu YF; Hao CP; Zhou C; Bao WS
    Opt Express; 2023 Mar; 31(6):9196-9210. PubMed ID: 37157494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental long-distance decoy-state quantum key distribution based on polarization encoding.
    Peng CZ; Zhang J; Yang D; Gao WB; Ma HX; Yin H; Zeng HP; Yang T; Wang XB; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Jan; 98(1):010505. PubMed ID: 17358464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Overcoming the rate-distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters.
    Lucamarini M; Yuan ZL; Dynes JF; Shields AJ
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):400-403. PubMed ID: 29720656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experimental Demonstration of High-Rate Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution over Asymmetric Channels.
    Liu H; Wang W; Wei K; Fang XT; Li L; Liu NL; Liang H; Zhang SJ; Zhang W; Li H; You L; Wang Z; Lo HK; Chen TY; Xu F; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Apr; 122(16):160501. PubMed ID: 31075015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reference-frame-independent, measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using fewer quantum states.
    Lee D; Hong S; Cho YW; Lim HT; Han SW; Jung H; Moon S; Lee KJ; Kim YS
    Opt Lett; 2020 May; 45(9):2624-2627. PubMed ID: 32356832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experimental composable security decoy-state quantum key distribution using time-phase encoding.
    Yin HL; Liu P; Dai WW; Ci ZH; Gu J; Gao T; Wang QW; Shen ZY
    Opt Express; 2020 Sep; 28(20):29479-29485. PubMed ID: 33114847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Unconditional security of a three state quantum key distribution protocol.
    Boileau JC; Tamaki K; Batuwantudawe J; Laflamme R; Renes JM
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Feb; 94(4):040503. PubMed ID: 15783540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sending-or-Not-Sending with Independent Lasers: Secure Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 509 km.
    Chen JP; Zhang C; Liu Y; Jiang C; Zhang W; Hu XL; Guan JY; Yu ZW; Xu H; Lin J; Li MJ; Chen H; Li H; You L; Wang Z; Wang XB; Zhang Q; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Feb; 124(7):070501. PubMed ID: 32142314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.