These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30321320)

  • 1. Differences in scar lesion formation between radiofrequency and cryoballoon in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison study using ultra-high-density mapping.
    Ruiz-Granell R; Ballesteros G; Andreu D; Erkiaga A; Ferrero-De-Loma-Osorio A; Ramos P; Martínez-Brotons A; Vives-Rodríguez E; Izquierdo-de-Francisco M; García-Bolao I
    Europace; 2019 Feb; 21(2):250-258. PubMed ID: 30321320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultra-high-density mapping of conduction gaps and atrial tachycardias: Distinctive patterns following pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon or contact-force-guided radiofrequency current.
    Gunawardene MA; Eickholt C; Akbulak RÖ; Jularic M; Klatt N; Hartmann J; Schlüter M; Meyer C; Willems S; Schaeffer B
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 May; 31(5):1051-1061. PubMed ID: 32107811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after multielectrode phased radiofrequency- and cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Wieczorek M; Sassani K; Hoeltgen R
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Apr; 20(1):197. PubMed ID: 32326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adenosine testing during cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Tokuda M; Matsuo S; Isogai R; Uno G; Tokutake K; Yokoyama K; Kato M; Narui R; Tanigawa S; Yamashita S; Inada K; Yoshimura M; Yamane T
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Nov; 13(11):2128-2134. PubMed ID: 27520540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. First-line catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcome of radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation.
    Straube F; Dorwarth U; Ammar-Busch S; Peter T; Noelker G; Massa T; Kuniss M; Ewertsen NC; Chun KR; Tebbenjohanns J; Tilz R; Kuck KH; Ouarrak T; Senges J; Hoffmann E;
    Europace; 2016 Mar; 18(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 26504108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence of silent cerebral infarctions after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing the second-generation cryoballoon.
    Nakamura T; Okishige K; Kanazawa T; Yamashita M; Kawaguchi N; Kato N; Aoyagi H; Yamauchi Y; Sasano T; Hirao K
    Europace; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1681-1688. PubMed ID: 27702854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fourth cryoballoon generation with a shorter tip to facilitate real-time pulmonary vein potential recording: Feasibility and safety results.
    Straube F; Dorwarth U; Pongratz J; Brück B; Wankerl M; Hartl S; Hoffmann E
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):918-925. PubMed ID: 30907462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Second-generation cryoballoon ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation after an index procedure with radiofrequency versus cryo: Different pulmonary vein reconnection patterns but similar long-term outcome-Results of a multicenter analysis.
    Glowniak A; Tarkowski A; Fic P; Wojewoda K; Wojcik J; Wysokinski A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jul; 30(7):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30938917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of energy source on early atrial fibrillation recurrences: a comparison of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency current energy ablation with the endpoint of unexcitability in pulmonary vein isolation.
    Gunawardene MA; Hoffmann BA; Schaeffer B; Chung DU; Moser J; Akbulak RO; Jularic M; Eickholt C; Nuehrich J; Meyer C; Willems S
    Europace; 2018 Jan; 20(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 27742775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociated pulmonary vein activity after cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Tokutake K; Tokuda M; Matsuo S; Isogai R; Yokoyama K; Kato M; Narui R; Tanigawa S; Yamashita S; Miyanaga S; Yoshimura M; Yamane T
    Heart Vessels; 2018 May; 33(5):529-536. PubMed ID: 29147788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in the electrophysiological findings of repeat ablation between patients who first underwent cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
    Inamura Y; Nitta J; Inaba O; Kono T; Ikenouchi T; Murata K; Takamiya T; Sato A; Matsumura Y; Takahashi Y; Goya M; Hirao K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1792-1800. PubMed ID: 31310033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the time of atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation influenced by the pattern of PV reconnections?
    Wieczorek M; Sassani K; Hoeltgen R
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Mar; 60(2):321-327. PubMed ID: 32621212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between atrial scar on cardiac magnetic resonance and pulmonary vein reconnection after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
    Jefairi NA; Camaioni C; Sridi S; Cheniti G; Takigawa M; Nivet H; Denis A; Derval N; Mathilde Merle ; Laurent F; Montaudon M; Sacher F; Hocini M; Haissaguerre M; Jais P; Cochet H
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 May; 30(5):727-740. PubMed ID: 30847990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency for pulmonary vein re-isolation after a failed initial ablation procedure in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
    Pokushalov E; Romanov A; Artyomenko S; Baranova V; Losik D; Bairamova S; Karaskov A; Mittal S; Steinberg JS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 23210695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Supplemental Radiofrequency Ablation After Acutely Unsuccessful Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation is Associated With Increased Risk of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation.
    Huang HD; Pietrasik G; Abid QU; Sharma PS; Krishnan K; Larsen TR; Trohman RG
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 May; 9(10):e015979. PubMed ID: 32394797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of conduction recovery after pulmonary vein isolation using the "single big cryoballoon" technique.
    Fürnkranz A; Chun KR; Nuyens D; Metzner A; Köster I; Schmidt B; Ouyang F; Kuck KH
    Heart Rhythm; 2010; 7(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 20129295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cryoballoon ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.
    Reissmann B; Metzner A; Kuck KH
    Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2017 May; 27(4):271-277. PubMed ID: 28089202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential gap location after radiofrequency versus cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation: Insights from a randomized trial with protocol-mandated repeat procedure.
    Sørensen SK; Johannessen A; Worck R; Hansen ML; Ruwald MH; Hansen J
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Mar; 34(3):519-526. PubMed ID: 36640430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeat Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Post Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation in the FIRE AND ICE Trial.
    Kuck KH; Albenque JP; Chun KJ; Fürnkranz A; Busch M; Elvan A; Schlüter M; Braegelmann KM; Kueffer FJ; Hemingway L; Arentz T; Tondo C; Brugada J;
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 May; 12(6):e007247. PubMed ID: 31693319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical recurrence and electrical pulmonary vein reconnections after second-generation cryoballoon ablation.
    Miyazaki S; Taniguchi H; Hachiya H; Nakamura H; Takagi T; Hirao K; Iesaka Y
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1852-7. PubMed ID: 27241352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.