These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30321320)
21. Electrophysiological findings in patients with isolated veins after cryoablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Varnavas V; Terasawa M; Sieira J; Abugattas JP; Ströker E; Paparella G; Iacopino S; Maj R; Osorio TG; De Greef Y; Bala G; Overeinder I; Brugada P; de Asmundis C; Chierchia GB J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2020 Sep; 21(9):641-647. PubMed ID: 32740497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. High Predictive Value of Adenosine Provocation in Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Visually Guided Laser Balloon Compared With Radiofrequency Ablation. Üçer E; Fredersdorf S; Seegers J; Poschenrieder F; Hauck C; Maier L; Jungbauer C Circ J; 2020 Feb; 84(3):404-410. PubMed ID: 32023574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Incidence of early pulmonary vein reconnections using different energy sources for pulmonary vein isolation: Multielectrode phased radiofrequency vs second-generation cryoballoon. Wieczorek M; Tajtaraghi S; Sassani K; Hoeltgen R J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1428-1435. PubMed ID: 31111548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. High rate of durable pulmonary vein isolation after second-generation cryoballoon ablation: analysis of repeat procedures. Bordignon S; Fürnkranz A; Perrotta L; Dugo D; Konstantinou A; Nowak B; Schulte-Hahn B; Schmidt B; Chun KR Europace; 2015 May; 17(5):725-31. PubMed ID: 25618741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation. Squara F; Zhao A; Marijon E; Latcu DG; Providencia R; Di Giovanni G; Jauvert G; Jourda F; Chierchia GB; De Asmundis C; Ciconte G; Alonso C; Grimard C; Boveda S; Cauchemez B; Saoudi N; Brugada P; Albenque JP; Thomas O Europace; 2015 May; 17(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 25840289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency lesions as detected by late-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance after ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a case-control study. Alarcón F; Cabanelas N; Izquierdo M; Benito E; Figueras I Ventura R; Guasch E; Prat-Gonzalez S; Perea RJ; Borràs R; Trotta O; Arbelo E; Tolosana JM; Sitges M; Berruezo A; Brugada J; Mont L Europace; 2020 Mar; 22(3):382-387. PubMed ID: 31821484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The second generation cryoballoon has improved durable isolation of left but not right pulmonary veins: new insights from a multicentre study. Martins RP; Galand V; Cesari O; Milhem A; Behar N; Auffret V; Daubert JC; Mabo P; Pavin D Europace; 2018 Jul; 20(7):1115-1121. PubMed ID: 29016748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Durability of thermal pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation assessed by mandated repeat invasive study. Calvert P; Ding WY; Mills MT; Snowdon R; Borbas Z; Modi S; Hall M; Morgan M; Clarkson N; Chackochen S; Barton J; Kemp I; Luther V; Gupta D Heart Rhythm; 2024 Sep; 21(9):1545-1554. PubMed ID: 38636929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Association of left atrium voltage amplitude and distribution with the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence and evolution after pulmonary vein isolation: An ultrahigh-density mapping study. Ballesteros G; Ravassa S; Bragard J; Ramos P; López B; Vives E; Neglia R; Wise B; González A; Moreno MU; Díez J; García-Bolao I J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1231-1240. PubMed ID: 31077505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients. Takamiya T; Nitta J; Inaba O; Sato A; Inamura Y; Kato N; Murata K; Ikenouchi T; Kono T; Nitta G; Matsumura Y; Takahashi Y; Goya M; Sasano T Heart Vessels; 2020 Dec; 35(12):1709-1716. PubMed ID: 32524235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. Buiatti A; von Olshausen G; Barthel P; Schneider S; Luik A; Kaess B; Laugwitz KL; Hoppmann P Europace; 2017 Mar; 19(3):378-384. PubMed ID: 27702864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identification of pulmonary vein reconnection gaps with high-density mapping in redo atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. García-Bolao I; Ballesteros G; Ramos P; Menéndez D; Erkiaga A; Neglia R; Jiménez Martín M; Vives-Rodríguez E Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f351-f358. PubMed ID: 28637187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Acute and Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using the Second-Generation Cryoballoon versus Open-Irrigated Radiofrequency: A Multicenter Experience. Aryana A; Singh SM; Kowalski M; Pujara DK; Cohen AI; Singh SK; Aleong RG; Banker RS; Fuenzalida CE; Prager NA; Bowers MR; D'Avila A; O'Neill PG J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):832-839. PubMed ID: 25917655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sex-specific efficacy and safety of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. du Fay de Lavallaz J; Clerc O; Pudenz C; Illigens B; Kühne M J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1819-1829. PubMed ID: 31310375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dissociated pulmonary vein activity after pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a predictor for recurrence? Buiatti A; Ammar S; Reents T; Semmler V; Kathan S; Hofmann M; Bourier F; Telishevska M; Koch-Büttner K; Kaess B; Lennerz C; Kolb C; Hessling G; Deisenhofer I J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 25091566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lesion distribution after cryoballoon ablation and hotballoon ablation: Late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Akita T; Kiuchi K; Fukuzawa K; Shimane A; Matsuyama S; Takami M; Kurose J; Oonishi H; Shigeru M; Nagamatsu YI; Suehiro H; Takemoto M; Nakamura T; Sakai J; Yatomi A; Mori S; Shimoyama S; Negi N; Kyotani K; Hirata KI J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1830-1840. PubMed ID: 31310389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Electrophysiologic and anatomic factors predictive of a need for touch-up radiofrequency application for complete pulmonary vein isolation: Comparison between hot balloon- and cryoballoon-based ablation. Wakamatsu Y; Nagashima K; Nakahara S; Iso K; Watanabe R; Arai M; Otsuka N; Yagyu S; Kurokawa S; Ohkubo K; Nakai T; Okumura Y J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1261-1269. PubMed ID: 31111558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A RAndomized Trial to compare the acute reconnection after pulmonary vein ISolation with Laser-BalloON versus radiofrequency Ablation: RATISBONA trial. Ücer E; Janeczko Y; Seegers J; Fredersdorf S; Friemel S; Poschenrieder F; Maier LS; Jungbauer CG J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 May; 29(5):733-739. PubMed ID: 29436052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Electrophysiological findings following pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency catheter guided by contact-force and second-generation cryoballoon: lessons from repeat ablation procedures. Ciconte G; Velagić V; Mugnai G; Saitoh Y; Irfan G; Hunuk B; Ströker E; Conte G; Sieira J; Di Giovanni G; Baltogiannis G; Brugada P; de Asmundis C; Chierchia GB Europace; 2016 Jan; 18(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 26445821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]