188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30322055)
1. Degree of Bacterial Contamination of Mobile Phone and Computer Keyboard Surfaces and Efficacy of Disinfection with Chlorhexidine Digluconate and Triclosan to Its Reduction.
Koscova J; Hurnikova Z; Pistl J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30322055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Big Concern for Public Health: Microbial Contamination of Mobile Phones.
Sadeeq T; Arikan A; Sanlidag T; Guler E; Suer K
J Infect Dev Ctries; 2021 Jun; 15(6):798-804. PubMed ID: 34242189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial contamination of keyboards: efficacy and functional impact of disinfectants.
Rutala WA; White MS; Gergen MF; Weber DJ
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 16622815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria on the Mobile Phones and Computer Keyboards of Healthcare University Students in Ghana.
Olu-Taiwo M; Laryea CA; Kweku Mykels D; Forson AO
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol; 2021; 2021():6647959. PubMed ID: 33936348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Keyboard cleanliness: a controlled study of the residual effect of chlorhexidine gluconate.
Jones R; Hutton A; Mariyaselvam M; Hodges E; Wong K; Blunt M; Young P
Am J Infect Control; 2015 Mar; 43(3):289-91. PubMed ID: 25728156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of six different disinfectants on removing five microbial species and effects on the topographic characteristics of acrylic resin.
da Silva FC; Kimpara ET; Mancini MN; Balducci I; Jorge AO; Koga-Ito CY
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):627-33. PubMed ID: 18761581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antimicrobial efficacy of a novel eucalyptus oil, chlorhexidine digluconate and isopropyl alcohol biocide formulation.
Hendry E; Conway B; Worthington T
Int J Mol Sci; 2012 Oct; 13(11):14016-25. PubMed ID: 23203047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of alcohol wipes used during aseptic manufacturing.
Panousi MN; Williams GJ; Girdlestone S; Hiom SJ; Maillard JY
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 May; 48(5):648-51. PubMed ID: 19228287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of various handwashing agents to decontaminate gloved hands.
Douglas CW; Millward TA; Clark A
Br Dent J; 1989 Jul; 167(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 2775587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decontamination of stethoscope membranes with chlorhexidine: Should it be recommended?
Álvarez JA; Ruíz SR; Mosqueda JL; León X; Arreguín V; Macías AE; Macias JH
Am J Infect Control; 2016 Nov; 44(11):e205-e209. PubMed ID: 27614707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contamination of hospital-use-only mobile phones and efficacy of 222-nm ultraviolet disinfection.
Kaiki Y; Kitagawa H; Hara T; Nomura T; Omori K; Shigemoto N; Takahashi S; Ohge H
Am J Infect Control; 2021 Jun; 49(6):800-803. PubMed ID: 33186680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disinfectant wipes transfer Clostridioides difficile spores from contaminated surfaces to uncontaminated surfaces during the disinfection process.
Nkemngong CA; Chaggar GK; Li X; Teska PJ; Oliver HF
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2020 Nov; 9(1):176. PubMed ID: 33148316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of alternative methods for the disinfection of toothbrushes.
Komiyama EY; Back-Brito GN; Balducci I; Koga-Ito CY
Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 20339710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of the immediate and sustained antibacterial action of two regimens, based on triclosan- and chlorhexidine-containing handwash preparations, on volunteers.
Bartzokas CA; Corkill JE; Makin T; Parry E
Epidemiol Infect; 1987 Jun; 98(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 3595750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of the efficacy of antimicrobial detergents for hand washing: using the full-hand touch plates method.
Namura S; Nishijima S; McGinley KJ; Leyden JJ
J Dermatol; 1993 Feb; 20(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 8478492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of disinfectant-impregnated wipes used for surface disinfection in hospitals: a review.
Song X; Vossebein L; Zille A
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2019; 8():139. PubMed ID: 31452873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DENTISTS' MOBILE PHONES AS A MEANS OF SPREADING CONDITIONALLY PATHOGENS.
Horzov L; Kryvcova M; Kostenko S; Yurzhenko A
Wiad Lek; 2022; 75(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 35092238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 4% chlorhexidine gluconate and 1% triclosan handwash products in an acute clinical ward.
Faoagali JL; George N; Fong J; Davy J; Dowser M
Am J Infect Control; 1999 Aug; 27(4):320-6. PubMed ID: 10433670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Cell Phone Microbial Contamination in Dental and Engineering Schools: Effect of Antibacterial Spray.
Hosseini Fard R; Hosseini Fard R; Moradi M; Hashemipour MA
J Epidemiol Glob Health; 2018 Dec; 8(3-4):143-148. PubMed ID: 30864755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the bactericidal effect of five products for surgical hand disinfection according to prEN 12054 and prEN 12791.
Marchetti MG; Kampf G; Finzi G; Salvatorelli G
J Hosp Infect; 2003 May; 54(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 12767849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
