247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30324353)
1. Targeted Prostate Biopsy and MR-Guided Therapy for Prostate Cancer.
Woodrum DA; Kawashima A; Gorny KR; Mynderse LA
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1096():159-184. PubMed ID: 30324353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Ablation.
Woodrum DA; Kawashima A; Gorny KR; Mynderse LA
Semin Intervent Radiol; 2019 Dec; 36(5):351-366. PubMed ID: 31798208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating localized prostate cancer and identifying candidates for focal therapy.
Sartor AO; Hricak H; Wheeler TM; Coleman J; Penson DF; Carroll PR; Rubin MA; Scardino PT
Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6 Suppl):S12-24. PubMed ID: 19095124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Targeted prostate biopsy and MR-guided therapy for prostate cancer.
Woodrum DA; Kawashima A; Gorny KR; Mynderse LA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):877-88. PubMed ID: 26907717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR-Guided Prostate Interventions.
Woodrum DA; Gorny KR; Mynderse LA
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 27(3):141-151. PubMed ID: 29870466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer treatment by the latest focal HIFU device with MRI/TRUS-fusion control biopsies: A prospective evaluation.
von Hardenberg J; Westhoff N; Baumunk D; Hausmann D; Martini T; Marx A; Porubsky S; Schostak M; Michel MS; Ritter M
Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 36(9):401.e1-401.e9. PubMed ID: 30093211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathological Findings in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Biopsy: Relation to Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy.
Gordetsky J; Rais-Bahrami S; Epstein JI
Urology; 2017 Jul; 105():18-23. PubMed ID: 28238758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoots IG; Nieboer D; Giganti F; Moore CM; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):946-958. PubMed ID: 29679430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
Wegelin O; van Melick HHE; Hooft L; Bosch JLHR; Reitsma HB; Barentsz JO; Somford DM
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):517-531. PubMed ID: 27568655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The feasibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for targeted biopsy using novel navigation systems to detect early stage prostate cancer: the preliminary experience.
Mouraviev V; Verma S; Kalyanaraman B; Zhai QJ; Gaitonde K; Pugnale M; Donovan JF
J Endourol; 2013 Jul; 27(7):820-5. PubMed ID: 22966987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy does not reliably identify dominant cancer location in men with low-risk prostate cancer.
Washington SL; Bonham M; Whitson JM; Cowan JE; Carroll PR
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 22077660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer detection and management: a systematic review.
Monni F; Fontanella P; Grasso A; Wiklund P; Ou YC; Randazzo M; Rocco B; Montanari E; Bianchi G
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):567-578. PubMed ID: 28488844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
