359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30324384)
1. Evaluation of osseous cervical foraminal stenosis in spinal radiculopathy using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Engel G; Bender YY; Adams LC; Boker SM; Fahlenkamp UL; Wagner M; Diederichs G; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1855-1862. PubMed ID: 30324384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of Osteophytes and Disc Herniations in Spinal Radiculopathy Using Susceptibility-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Bender YY; Diederichs G; Walter TC; Wagner M; Liebig T; Rickert M; Hermann KG; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Invest Radiol; 2017 Feb; 52(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 27548342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MDCT and MRI for identifying the severity and cause of neural foraminal stenosis in cervical radiculopathy: a prospective study.
Douglas-Akinwande AC; Rydberg J; Shah MV; Phillips MD; Caldemeyer KS; Lurito JT; Ying J; Mathews VP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 20028905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Zero-Echo Time MRI for the Evaluation of Cervical Neural Foraminal Stenosis.
Argentieri EC; Koff MF; Breighner RE; Endo Y; Shah PH; Sneag DB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jul; 43(13):928-933. PubMed ID: 29095415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Severity of foraminal lumbar stenosis and the relation to clinical symptoms and response to periradicular infiltration-introduction of the "melting sign".
Farshad M; Sutter R; Hoch A
Spine J; 2018 Feb; 18(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 28739476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of oblique magnetic resonance images for evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis.
Park MS; Moon SH; Lee HM; Kim TH; Oh JK; Lee SY; Oh JB; Riew KD
Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):607-11. PubMed ID: 25452016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two MR grading systems for correlation between grade of cervical neural foraminal stenosis and clinical manifestations.
Lee KH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Rho MH; Shin H; Kwon YJ
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150971. PubMed ID: 27007709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of sclerosis in Modic changes of the spine using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Böker SM; Bender YY; Adams LC; Fallenberg EM; Wagner M; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():148-154. PubMed ID: 28189200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical foraminal stenosis: comparison of 3D T2 SPACE with sagittal oblique 2D T2 TSE.
Barnaure I; Galley J; Fritz B; Sutter R
Skeletal Radiol; 2022 Jul; 51(7):1453-1462. PubMed ID: 35006279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deep-learning-reconstructed high-resolution 3D cervical spine MRI for foraminal stenosis evaluation.
Jardon M; Tan ET; Chazen JL; Sahr M; Wen Y; Schneider B; Sneag DB
Skeletal Radiol; 2023 Apr; 52(4):725-732. PubMed ID: 36269331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep learning reconstruction for 1.5 T cervical spine MRI: effect on interobserver agreement in the evaluation of degenerative changes.
Yasaka K; Tanishima T; Ohtake Y; Tajima T; Akai H; Ohtomo K; Abe O; Kiryu S
Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6118-6125. PubMed ID: 35348861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional morphological analysis of cervical foraminal stenosis using dynamic flexion-extension computed tomography images.
Mizouchi T; Katsumi K; Izumi T; Yamazaki A; Shoji H; Tashi H; Ohashi M; Hirano T; Endo N; Watanabe K
J Orthop Sci; 2020 Sep; 25(5):805-811. PubMed ID: 31831318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.
Park HJ; Kim SS; Lee SY; Park NH; Chung EC; Rho MH; Kwon HJ; Kook SH
Br J Radiol; 2013 May; 86(1025):20120515. PubMed ID: 23410800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of magnetic resonance myelography in the investigation of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.
Birchall D; Connelly D; Walker L; Hall K
Br J Radiol; 2003 Aug; 76(908):525-31. PubMed ID: 12893693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of L7-S1 nerve root pathology with low-field MRI in dogs with lumbosacral foraminal stenosis.
Lichtenhahn V; Richter H; Gödde T; Kircher P
Vet Surg; 2020 Jul; 49(5):947-957. PubMed ID: 32342548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for grading cervical neural foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.
Park HJ; Kim SS; Han CH; Lee SY; Chung EC; Kim MS; Kwon HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 25055278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Dynamic Foraminal Stenosis with Positional MRI in Patients with C6 Radiculopathy-Mimicking Pain: A Prospective Radiologic Cohort Study.
Kaya O; Sariyilmaz K; Tutpinar Y; Cakmak MF; Cakir MS; Ozkunt O
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1385387. PubMed ID: 35722464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical usefulness of CT-myelogram comparing with the MRI in degenerative cervical spinal disorders: is CTM still useful for primary diagnostic tool?
Song KJ; Choi BW; Kim GH; Kim JR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 19525791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Curve Characteristics and Foraminal Dimensions in Patients With Adult Scoliosis and Radiculopathy.
Pugely AJ; Ries Z; Gnanapragasam G; Gao Y; Nash R; Mendoza-Lattes SA
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Mar; 30(2):E111-E118. PubMed ID: 28207622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic review of radiological cervical foraminal grading systems.
Meacock J; Schramm M; Selvanathan S; Currie S; Stocken D; Jayne D; Thomson S
Neuroradiology; 2021 Mar; 63(3):305-316. PubMed ID: 33392737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
