371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30324384)
21. Systematic review of radiological cervical foraminal grading systems.
Meacock J; Schramm M; Selvanathan S; Currie S; Stocken D; Jayne D; Thomson S
Neuroradiology; 2021 Mar; 63(3):305-316. PubMed ID: 33392737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Outcome of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection According to Severity of Cervical Foraminal Stenosis.
Kim MS; Lee DG; Chang MC
World Neurosurg; 2018 Feb; 110():e398-e403. PubMed ID: 29138074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of noncontrast computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of Great Danes with cervical spondylomyelopathy.
Martin-Vaquero P; da Costa RC; Drost WT
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2014; 55(5):496-505. PubMed ID: 24547789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. MRI of non-specific low back pain and/or lumbar radiculopathy: do we need T1 when using a sagittal T2-weighted Dixon sequence?
Zanchi F; Richard R; Hussami M; Monier A; Knebel JF; Omoumi P
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2583-2593. PubMed ID: 32020402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of angled sagittal MRI and conventional MRI in the diagnosis of herniated disc and stenosis in the cervical foramen.
Shim JH; Park CK; Lee JH; Choi JW; Lee DC; Kim DH; Kim JK; Hwang JH
Eur Spine J; 2009 Aug; 18(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19294432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Oblique Sagittal Images Prevent Underestimation of the Neuroforaminal Stenosis Grade Caused by Disc Herniation in Cervical Spine MRI.
Kintzelé L; Rehnitz C; Kauczor HU; Weber MA
Rofo; 2018 Oct; 190(10):946-954. PubMed ID: 29874691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of MRI grading for cervical neural foraminal stenosis based on axial and oblique sagittal images: Concordance and reliability study.
Kim W; Ahn KS; Kang CH; Kang WY; Yang KS
Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():165-169. PubMed ID: 28334616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Utility of Oblique Sagittal Reformatted and Three-dimensional Surface Reconstruction Computed Tomography in Foraminal Stenosis Decompression.
Oshina M; Oshima Y; Tanaka S; Tan LA; Li XJ; Tuchman A; Riew KD
Sci Rep; 2018 Oct; 8(1):16011. PubMed ID: 30375504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantitative evaluation for cervical foraminal bony stenosis based on angled sagittal slices along a nerve root on computed tomography.
Ozaki M; Nishioka K; Kitayama M; Kawaguchi T; Nakao N
J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 71():89-92. PubMed ID: 31685289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Deep Learning Model for Automated Detection and Classification of Central Canal, Lateral Recess, and Neural Foraminal Stenosis at Lumbar Spine MRI.
Hallinan JTPD; Zhu L; Yang K; Makmur A; Algazwi DAR; Thian YL; Lau S; Choo YS; Eide SE; Yap QV; Chan YH; Tan JH; Kumar N; Ooi BC; Yoshioka H; Quek ST
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):130-138. PubMed ID: 33973835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Neurography in Cervical Radiculopathy: Plexus Patterns and Peripheral Nerve Lesions.
Schwarz D; Kele H; Kronlage M; Godel T; Hilgenfeld T; Bendszus M; Bäumer P
Invest Radiol; 2018 Mar; 53(3):158-166. PubMed ID: 28976477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T.
Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY
Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Differentiation of Predominantly Osteoblastic and Osteolytic Spine Metastases by Using Susceptibility-weighted MRI.
Böker SM; Adams LC; Bender YY; Fahlenkamp UL; Wagner M; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):146-154. PubMed ID: 30375926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Utility of coronal oblique slices in cervical spine MRI: Improved detection of the neuroforamina].
Freund W; Klessinger S; Mueller M; Halatsch ME; Hoepner G; Weber F; Schmitz B
Radiologe; 2015 Nov; 55(11):1000-8. PubMed ID: 26311439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reliability of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging methods in the assessment of spinal canal stenosis and cord compression in cervical myelopathy.
Karpova A; Arun R; Davis AM; Kulkarni AV; Mikulis DJ; Sooyong C; Rabin D; Craciunas S; Smith SR; Hansen MA; George J; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 22772577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MRI for the detection of calcific features of vertebral haemangioma.
Bender YY; Böker SM; Diederichs G; Walter T; Wagner M; Fallenberg E; Liebig T; Rickert M; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Clin Radiol; 2017 Aug; 72(8):692.e1-692.e7. PubMed ID: 28330684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of agreement of cervical spine degenerative pathology findings in magnetic resonance imaging studies.
Fu MC; Webb ML; Buerba RA; Neway WE; Brown JE; Trivedi M; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN
Spine J; 2016 Jan; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26291398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of intracranial meningioma-associated calcifications using susceptibility-weighted MRI.
Adams LC; Böker SM; Bender YY; Fallenberg EM; Wagner M; Buchert R; Hamm B; Makowski MR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 46(4):1177-1186. PubMed ID: 28106942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Oblique reformation in cervical spine computed tomography: a new look at an old friend.
Roberts CC; McDaniel NT; Krupinski EA; Erly WK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jan; 28(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 12544934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Virtual Reality-Based Evaluation of Surgical Planning and Outcome of Monosegmental, Unilateral Cervical Foraminal Stenosis.
Zawy Alsofy S; Stroop R; Fusek I; Welzel Saravia H; Sakellaropoulou I; Yavuz M; Ewelt C; Nakamura M; Fortmann T
World Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 129():e857-e865. PubMed ID: 31300351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
