These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30324869)

  • 1. From engaging publics to engaging knowledges: Enacting "appropriateness" in the Austrian biobank infrastructure.
    Goisauf M; Durnová AP
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Apr; 28(3):275-289. PubMed ID: 30324869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integration of Biobanks in National eHealth Ecosystems Facilitating Long-Term Longitudinal Clinical-Omics Studies and Citizens' Engagement in Research Through eHealthBioR.
    Antoniades A; Papaioannou M; Malatras A; Papagregoriou G; Müller H; Holub P; Deltas C; Schizas CN
    Front Digit Health; 2021; 3():628646. PubMed ID: 34713101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement.
    Burgess M; O'Doherty K; Secko D
    Per Med; 2008 May; 5(3):285-296. PubMed ID: 29783499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An overview of the role of society and risk in xenotransplantation.
    Sobbrio P; Jorqui M
    Xenotransplantation; 2014; 21(6):523-32. PubMed ID: 25040770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constructing populations in biobanking.
    Tupasela A; Snell K; Cañada JA
    Life Sci Soc Policy; 2015; 11():5. PubMed ID: 26194269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation.
    O'Doherty KC; Hawkins AK; Burgess MM
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Nov; 75(9):1604-11. PubMed ID: 22867865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality Management in Polish Biobanking Network-Current Status Before the Implementation of Unified and Harmonized Integrated Quality Management System.
    Matera-Witkiewicz A; Krupińska M; Sitek P; Laskowski M; Zagórska K; Gleńska-Olender J
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():780294. PubMed ID: 35083242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.
    Burgess MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24434712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Still Rather Hazy at Present": Citizens' and Physicians' Views on Returning Results from Biobank Research Using Broad Consent.
    Barazzetti G; Cavalli S; Benaroyo L; Kaufmann A
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2017 Mar; 21(3):159-165. PubMed ID: 28177781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public knowledge and public trust.
    Cunningham-Burley S
    Community Genet; 2006; 9(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16741351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The biobanking research infrastructure BBMRI_CZ: a critical tool to enhance translational cancer research.
    Holub P; Greplova K; Knoflickova D; Nenutil R; Valik D
    Klin Onkol; 2012; 25 Suppl 2():2S78-81. PubMed ID: 23581021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding public reactions to commercialization of biobanks and use of biobank resources.
    Nicol D; Critchley C; McWhirter R; Whitton T
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 Aug; 162():79-87. PubMed ID: 27343817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation.
    O'Doherty KC; Burgess MM
    Public Health Genomics; 2009; 12(4):203-15. PubMed ID: 19367089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personalized assent for pediatric biobanks.
    Giesbertz NA; Melham K; Kaye J; van Delden JJ; Bredenoord AL
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):59. PubMed ID: 27733160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conception and Implementation of an Austrian Biobank Directory Integration Framework.
    Hofer-Picout P; Pichler H; Eder J; Neururer SB; Müller H; Reihs R; Holub P; Insam T; Goebel G
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2017 Aug; 15(4):332-340. PubMed ID: 28380303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards 'Engagement 2.0': Insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants.
    Teare HJ; Morrison M; Whitley EA; Kaye J
    Digit Health; 2015; 1():2055207615605644. PubMed ID: 29942545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptions of legislation relating to the sharing of genomic biobank results with donors-a survey of BBMRI-ERIC biobanks.
    Brunfeldt M; Teare H; Soini S; Kääriäinen H
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2018 Mar; 26(3):324-329. PubMed ID: 29330544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Publics in the making: mediating different methods of engagement and the publics these construct : commentary on: "Technologies of democracy: experiments and demonstrations".
    Mohr A
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):667-72. PubMed ID: 21984332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods.
    Gehrke PJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23887250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Food, publics, science.
    Blue G
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Mar; 19(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 20533794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.