These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30325102)

  • 1. CRISPR-PLANT v2: an online resource for highly specific guide RNA spacers based on improved off-target analysis.
    Minkenberg B; Zhang J; Xie K; Yang Y
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2019 Jan; 17(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 30325102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CRISPR GUARD protects off-target sites from Cas9 nuclease activity using short guide RNAs.
    Coelho MA; De Braekeleer E; Firth M; Bista M; Lukasiak S; Cuomo ME; Taylor BJM
    Nat Commun; 2020 Aug; 11(1):4132. PubMed ID: 32807781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advances in detecting and reducing off-target effects generated by CRISPR-mediated genome editing.
    Li J; Hong S; Chen W; Zuo E; Yang H
    J Genet Genomics; 2019 Nov; 46(11):513-521. PubMed ID: 31911131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SeqCor: correct the effect of guide RNA sequences in clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 screening by machine learning algorithm.
    Liu X; Yang Y; Qiu Y; Reyad-Ul-Ferdous M; Ding Q; Wang Y
    J Genet Genomics; 2020 Nov; 47(11):672-680. PubMed ID: 33451939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Battling CRISPR-Cas9 off-target genome editing.
    Li D; Zhou H; Zeng X
    Cell Biol Toxicol; 2019 Oct; 35(5):403-406. PubMed ID: 31313008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimizing off-target effects in CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.
    Chen SJ
    Cell Biol Toxicol; 2019 Oct; 35(5):399-401. PubMed ID: 31317359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Engineering guide RNA to reduce the off-target effects of CRISPR.
    Wu J; Yin H
    J Genet Genomics; 2019 Nov; 46(11):523-529. PubMed ID: 31902584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CRISPR/Cas9 for plant genome editing: accomplishments, problems and prospects.
    Paul JW; Qi Y
    Plant Cell Rep; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1417-27. PubMed ID: 27114166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PEG-Delivered CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins System for Gene-Editing Screening of Maize Protoplasts.
    Sant'Ana RRA; Caprestano CA; Nodari RO; Agapito-Tenfen SZ
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 32887261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing for the Treatment of Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1.
    Marsh S; Hanson B; Wood MJA; Varela MA; Roberts TC
    Mol Ther; 2020 Dec; 28(12):2527-2539. PubMed ID: 33171139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CRISPR-P 2.0: An Improved CRISPR-Cas9 Tool for Genome Editing in Plants.
    Liu H; Ding Y; Zhou Y; Jin W; Xie K; Chen LL
    Mol Plant; 2017 Mar; 10(3):530-532. PubMed ID: 28089950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CRISPR Guide RNA Design Guidelines for Efficient Genome Editing.
    Schindele P; Wolter F; Puchta H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2166():331-342. PubMed ID: 32710418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strategies for Optimization of the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat-Based Genome Editing System for Enhanced Editing Specificity.
    Wang YM; Wang HZ; Jian YZ; Luo ZT; Shao HW; Zhang WF
    Hum Gene Ther; 2022 Apr; 33(7-8):358-370. PubMed ID: 34963339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chimeric DNA-RNA Guide RNA Designs.
    Lu S; Zhang Y; Yin H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2162():79-85. PubMed ID: 32926379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Introduction to Methods for Discovery and Functional Analysis of MicroRNAs in Plants.
    Armenta-Medina A; Gillmor CS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1932():1-14. PubMed ID: 30701488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can genetic engineering-based methods for gene function identification be eclipsed by genome editing in plants? A comparison of methodologies.
    Amritha PP; Shah JM
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2021 May; 296(3):485-500. PubMed ID: 33751237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doxycycline-Dependent Self-Inactivation of CRISPR-Cas9 to Temporally Regulate On- and Off-Target Editing.
    Kelkar A; Zhu Y; Groth T; Stolfa G; Stablewski AB; Singhi N; Nemeth M; Neelamegham S
    Mol Ther; 2020 Jan; 28(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 31601489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Toolkit of CRISPR-Based Genome Editing Systems in Drosophila.
    Xu J; Ren X; Sun J; Wang X; Qiao HH; Xu BW; Liu LP; Ni JQ
    J Genet Genomics; 2015 Apr; 42(4):141-9. PubMed ID: 25953352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CRISPR as a strong gene editing tool.
    Shen S; Loh TJ; Shen H; Zheng X; Shen H
    BMB Rep; 2017 Jan; 50(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 27616359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CRISPR/Cas precision: do we need to worry about off-targeting in plants?
    Hahn F; Nekrasov V
    Plant Cell Rep; 2019 Apr; 38(4):437-441. PubMed ID: 30426198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.