531 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30325603)
1. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting surgical margin positivity in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.
Yuksel M; Karamık K; Anıl H; Islamoglu E; Ates M; Savas M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):71-74. PubMed ID: 28403595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.
Tan N; Shen L; Khoshnoodi P; Alcalá HE; Yu W; Hsu W; Reiter RE; Lu DY; Raman SS
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1218-1223. PubMed ID: 29128577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.
Vargas C; Kestin LL; Weed DW; Krauss D; Vicini FA; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):714-24. PubMed ID: 15708249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.
Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Location of positive surgical margin and its association with biochemical recurrence rate do not differ significantly in four different types of radical prostatectomy.
Suh YS; Jang HJ; Song W; Lee HW; Kim HS; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
Korean J Urol; 2014 Dec; 55(12):802-7. PubMed ID: 25512814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Focal nodular enhancement on DCE MRI of the prostatectomy bed: radiologic-pathologic correlations and prognostic value.
Park MY; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK
Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2985-2994. PubMed ID: 36350389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
