202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30326312)
1. Lumbar Total Disc Replacement by the Lateral Approach-Up to 10 Years Follow-Up.
Pokorny G; Marchi L; Amaral R; Jensen R; Pimenta L
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e325-e333. PubMed ID: 30326312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
Pimenta L; Oliveira L; Schaffa T; Coutinho E; Marchi L
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 21166491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An 11-year minimum follow-up of the Charite III lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease.
Lu SB; Hai Y; Kong C; Wang QY; Su Q; Zang L; Kang N; Meng XL; Wang Y
Eur Spine J; 2015 Sep; 24(9):2056-64. PubMed ID: 25895882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motion preservation following total lumbar disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction: a prospective long-term clinical and radiographic investigation.
Wuertinger C; Annes RDÀ; Hitzl W; Siepe CJ
Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 28673830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Results of Activ L Total Disk Replacement at 1- to 3-Year Follow-up.
Lu S; Kong C; Hai Y; Kang N; Zang L; Wang Y; Yuan Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Nov; 28(9):E544-50. PubMed ID: 25532603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lumbar total disc replacement by less invasive lateral approach: a report of results from two centers in the US IDE clinical trial of the XL TDR® device.
Tohmeh AG; Smith WD
Eur Spine J; 2015 Apr; 24 Suppl 3():331-8. PubMed ID: 25794698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion.
Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Cong GT; Tsiouris AJ; James AR; Paulo D; Elowitz E; Härtl R
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):623-35. PubMed ID: 24702513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mid- to long-term results of total disc replacement for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review.
Cui XD; Li HT; Zhang W; Zhang LL; Luo ZP; Yang HL
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 13(1):326. PubMed ID: 30585142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of the anterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar disc arthroplasty: 36-Month follow-up experience in extreme lateral total disc replacement.
Marchi L; Oliveira L; Coutinho E; Pimenta L
Int J Spine Surg; 2012; 6():18-23. PubMed ID: 25694866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcome of lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L in degenerative disc disease: minimum 5-year follow-up results at a single institute.
Park CK; Ryu KS; Lee KY; Lee HJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(8):672-7. PubMed ID: 21857395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early experience with lateral lumbar total disc replacement: Utility, complications and revision strategies.
Malham GM; Parker RM
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 May; 39():176-183. PubMed ID: 28215460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome.
Meisel HJ; Jurák L; Antinheimo J; Arregui R; Bruchmann B; Čabraja M; Caroli F; Kroppenstedt S; Kryl J; Pohjola J; Shackleford I; Sola S; Stosberg P; Stulik J; Woiciechowsky C; Suchomel P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 27258476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maverick total disc arthroplasty performs well at 10 years follow-up: a prospective study with HRQL and balance analysis.
Plais N; Thevenot X; Cogniet A; Rigal J; Le Huec JC
Eur Spine J; 2018 Mar; 27(3):720-727. PubMed ID: 28382391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of a mismatched center of rotation on the clinical outcomes and flexion-extension range of motion: lumbar total disk replacement using mobidisc at a 5.5-year follow-up.
Lee CS; Lee DH; Hwang CJ; Kim H; Noh H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 May; 27(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 22525508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term clinical results following Charite III lumbar total disc replacement.
Lu S; Sun S; Kong C; Sun W; Hu H; Wang Q; Hai Y
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):917-925. PubMed ID: 28870839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement.
Mehren C; Heider F; Siepe CJ; Zillner B; Kothe R; Korge A; Mayer HM
Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2441-2449. PubMed ID: 28676980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
