208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30326780)
1. Accuracy of the wearable activity tracker Garmin Forerunner 235 for the assessment of heart rate during rest and activity.
Støve MP; Haucke E; Nymann ML; Sigurdsson T; Larsen BT
J Sports Sci; 2019 Apr; 37(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 30326780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement latency significantly contributes to reduced heart rate measurement accuracy in wearable devices.
Støve MP; Holm RS; Kjaersgaard AS; Duncker K; Jensen MR; Larsen BT
J Med Eng Technol; 2020 Apr; 44(3):125-132. PubMed ID: 32404012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity of heart rate measurements by the Garmin Forerunner 225 at different walking intensities.
Claes J; Buys R; Avila A; Finlay D; Kennedy A; Guldenring D; Budts W; Cornelissen V
J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Aug; 41(6):480-485. PubMed ID: 28675070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic Identification of Physical Activity Type and Duration by Wearable Activity Trackers: A Validation Study.
Dorn D; Gorzelitz J; Gangnon R; Bell D; Koltyn K; Cadmus-Bertram L
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 May; 7(5):e13547. PubMed ID: 31124470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running.
Price K; Bird SR; Lythgo N; Raj IS; Wong JY; Lynch C
J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 27919170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of Wearable Activity Monitors during Cycling and Resistance Exercise.
Boudreaux BD; Hebert EP; Hollander DB; Williams BM; Cormier CL; Naquin MR; Gillan WW; Gusew EE; Kraemer RR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):624-633. PubMed ID: 29189666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variable Accuracy of Wearable Heart Rate Monitors during Aerobic Exercise.
Gillinov S; Etiwy M; Wang R; Blackburn G; Phelan D; Gillinov AM; Houghtaling P; Javadikasgari H; Desai MY
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Aug; 49(8):1697-1703. PubMed ID: 28709155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of Wrist-Worn photoplethysmography devices to measure heart rate: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Weaver RG; Armstrong B; Burkart S; Zhang S; Beets MW
J Sports Sci; 2020 Sep; 38(17):2021-2034. PubMed ID: 32552580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Concurrent heart rate validity of wearable technology devices during trail running.
Navalta JW; Montes J; Bodell NG; Salatto RW; Manning JW; DeBeliso M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238569. PubMed ID: 32866216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of energy expenditure during high intensity cycling and running using a heart rate and activity monitor in young active adults.
Klass M; Faoro V; Carpentier A
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224948. PubMed ID: 31697742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating Accuracy at Exercise Intensities: A Comparative Study of Self-Monitoring Heart Rate and Physical Activity Wearable Devices.
Dooley EE; Golaszewski NM; Bartholomew JB
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Mar; 5(3):e34. PubMed ID: 28302596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wrist-Worn Wearables for Monitoring Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure While Sitting or Performing Light-to-Vigorous Physical Activity: Validation Study.
Düking P; Giessing L; Frenkel MO; Koehler K; Holmberg HC; Sperlich B
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 May; 8(5):e16716. PubMed ID: 32374274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?
An HS; Jones GC; Kang SK; Welk GJ; Lee JM
Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Apr; 17(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 27912681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of wearable physical activity trackers in people with Parkinson's disease.
Lamont RM; Daniel HL; Payne CL; Brauer SG
Gait Posture; 2018 Jun; 63():104-108. PubMed ID: 29729611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of Heart Rate Using the Polar OH1 and Fitbit Charge 3 Wearable Devices in Healthy Adults During Light, Moderate, Vigorous, and Sprint-Based Exercise: Validation Study.
Muggeridge DJ; Hickson K; Davies AV; Giggins OM; Megson IL; Gorely T; Crabtree DR
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Mar; 9(3):e25313. PubMed ID: 33764310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of Polar OH1 optical heart rate sensor for moderate and high intensity physical activities.
Hettiarachchi IT; Hanoun S; Nahavandi D; Nahavandi S
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217288. PubMed ID: 31120968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The validity of activity trackers is affected by walking speed: the criterion validity of Garmin Vivosmart
Svarre FR; Jensen MM; Nielsen J; Villumsen M
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9381. PubMed ID: 32742766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Optical Heart Rate Sensing Technology in Wearable Fitness Trackers for Young and Older Adults: Validation and Comparison Study.
Chow HW; Yang CC
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Apr; 8(4):e14707. PubMed ID: 32343255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cycling Versus Uphill Walking: Impact on Locomotor Muscle Fatigue and Running Exercise.
Pageaux B; Theurel J; Lepers R
Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2017 Nov; 12(10):1310-1318. PubMed ID: 28290716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Polar M600 Optical Heart Rate and ECG Heart Rate during Exercise.
Horton JF; Stergiou P; Fung TS; Katz L
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Dec; 49(12):2600-2607. PubMed ID: 29135785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
