These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30327149)

  • 1. Tone-in-noise detection deficits in elderly patients with clinically normal hearing.
    Ralli M; Greco A; De Vincentiis M; Sheppard A; Cappelli G; Neri I; Salvi R
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2019; 40(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 30327149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
    Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Aging and the High-Frequency Auditory Threshold on Speech-Evoked Mismatch Negativity in a Noisy Background.
    Chen J; Chen S; Zheng Y; Ou Y
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26650255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.
    Kortlang S; Mauermann M; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abnormal speech processing in frequency regions where absolute thresholds are normal for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.
    Léger AC; Moore BC; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):95-103. PubMed ID: 23104012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal processing in the aging auditory system.
    Strouse A; Ashmead DH; Ohde RN; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2385-99. PubMed ID: 10491702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of growth of masking functions and speech discrimination abilities in younger and older adults.
    Cheesman MF; Hepburn D; Armitage JC; Marshall K
    Audiology; 1995; 34(6):321-33. PubMed ID: 8833312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence that hidden hearing loss underlies amplitude modulation encoding deficits in individuals with and without tinnitus.
    Paul BT; Bruce IC; Roberts LE
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():170-182. PubMed ID: 27888040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech-in-noise perception in unilateral hearing loss: Relation to pure-tone thresholds and brainstem plasticity.
    Vannson N; James CJ; Fraysse B; Lescure B; Strelnikov K; Deguine O; Barone P; Marx M
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():135-143. PubMed ID: 28623107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
    Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting Speech-in-Noise Deficits from the Audiogram.
    Shub DE; Makashay MJ; Brungart DS
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 31107363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. I. Age and lateral asymmetry effects.
    Divenyi PL; Haupt KM
    Ear Hear; 1997 Feb; 18(1):42-61. PubMed ID: 9058037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907. PubMed ID: 12083223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.