These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30327828)

  • 1. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma ablative margins using fused pre- and post-ablation hepatobiliary phase images.
    Takeyama N; Mizobuchi N; Sakaki M; Shimozuma Y; Munechika J; Kajiwara A; Uchikoshi M; Uozumi S; Ohgiya Y; Gokan T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):923-935. PubMed ID: 30327828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Value of Nonrigid Registration of Pre-Procedure MR with Post-Procedure CT After Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Park J; Lee JM; Lee DH; Joo I; Yoon JH; Park JY; Klotz E
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2017 Jun; 40(6):873-883. PubMed ID: 28091728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of Local Tumor Progression after Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Assessment of Ablative Margin Using Pre-RFA MRI and Post-RFA CT Registration.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Klotz E; Woo H; Yu MH; Joo I; Lee ES; Han JK
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(6):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 30386137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging evaluation of ablative margin and index tumor immediately after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison between multidetector-row CT and MR imaging.
    Kim SM; Shin SS; Lee BC; Kim JW; Heo SH; Lim HS; Jeong YY
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Oct; 42(10):2527-2537. PubMed ID: 28409202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of three-dimensional Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR fusion imaging with CT fusion imaging in the assessment of treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Makino Y; Imai Y; Igura T; Hori M; Fukuda K; Sawai Y; Kogita S; Fujita N; Takehara T; Murakami T
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 25052767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (> 2 and < 5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion.
    Kim YS; Lee WJ; Rhim H; Lim HK; Choi D; Lee JY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):758-65. PubMed ID: 20729457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimal ablative margin (MAM) assessment with image fusion: an independent predictor for local tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation.
    Laimer G; Schullian P; Jaschke N; Putzer D; Eberle G; Alzaga A; Odisio B; Bale R
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2463-2472. PubMed ID: 32002642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does hepatobiliary phase sequence qualitatively outperform unenhanced T1-weighted imaging in assessment of the ablation margin 24 hours after thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas?
    Takeyama N; Vidhyarkorn S; Chung DJ; Siripongsakun S; Kim HJ; Lu DS; Raman SS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Oct; 41(10):1942-55. PubMed ID: 27271219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fusion imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluating the early therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas with iso-echoic or unclear margins on conventional ultrasonography.
    Nishigori S; Numata K; Irie K; Fukuda H; Chuma M; Maeda S
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2018 Jul; 45(3):405-415. PubMed ID: 29362966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging with gadoxetic acid for local tumour progression after radiofrequency ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Kang TW; Rhim H; Lee J; Song KD; Lee MW; Kim YS; Lim HK; Jang KM; Kim SH; Gwak GY; Jung SH
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3437-46. PubMed ID: 26747262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-Dimensional Measurement of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ablation Zones and Margins for Predicting Local Tumor Progression.
    Hocquelet A; Trillaud H; Frulio N; Papadopoulos P; Balageas P; Salut C; Meyer M; Blanc JF; Montaudon M; Denis de Senneville B
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):1038-1045.e2. PubMed ID: 27156743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide.
    Fukuda K; Mori K; Hasegawa N; Nasu K; Ishige K; Okamoto Y; Shiigai M; Abei M; Minami M; Hyodo I
    Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):555-563. PubMed ID: 31102138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Percutaneous US/MRI Fusion-guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Subcentimeter Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Technical Feasibility and Therapeutic Outcomes.
    Song KD; Lee MW; Rhim H; Kang TW; Cha DI; Sinn DH; Lim HK
    Radiology; 2018 Sep; 288(3):878-886. PubMed ID: 29916771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound-ultrasound image overlay fusion improves real-time control of radiofrequency ablation margin in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Minami Y; Minami T; Hagiwara S; Ida H; Ueshima K; Nishida N; Murakami T; Kudo M
    Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1986-1993. PubMed ID: 29196855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3D fusion is superior to 2D point-to-point contrast-enhanced US to evaluate the ablative margin after RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Long H; Zhou X; Zhang X; Ye J; Huang T; Cong L; Xie X; Huang G
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):1247-1257. PubMed ID: 37572191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ablative safety margin depicted by fusion imaging with post-treatment contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pre-treatment CECT/CEMRI after radiofrequency ablation for liver cancers.
    Bo XW; Xu HX; Guo LH; Sun LP; Li XL; Zhao CK; He YP; Liu BJ; Li DD; Zhang K; Wang D
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 90(1078):20170063. PubMed ID: 28749166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical usefulness of the ablative margin assessed by magnetic resonance imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Okamoto T; Hodozuka M; Miyoshi K; Kishina M; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Sugihara T; Oyama K; Hosho K; Okano J; Murawaki Y; Kakite S; Yamashita E
    J Hepatol; 2015 Dec; 63(6):1360-7. PubMed ID: 26232269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of ablative margin by unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Miyoshi K; Kishina M; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Okamoto K; Murawaki Y; Kakite S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2730-6. PubMed ID: 22137612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of radiofrequency ablation margin by MRI-MRI image fusion in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Wang XL; Li K; Su ZZ; Huang ZP; Wang P; Zheng RQ
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(17):5345-51. PubMed ID: 25954109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of ablation margins based on registration of pre- and post-procedural MRI and distance map.
    Tani S; Tatli S; Hata N; Garcia-Rojas X; Olubiyi OI; Silverman SG; Tokuda J
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jun; 11(6):1133-42. PubMed ID: 27038962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.