BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30327828)

  • 1. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma ablative margins using fused pre- and post-ablation hepatobiliary phase images.
    Takeyama N; Mizobuchi N; Sakaki M; Shimozuma Y; Munechika J; Kajiwara A; Uchikoshi M; Uozumi S; Ohgiya Y; Gokan T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):923-935. PubMed ID: 30327828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Value of Nonrigid Registration of Pre-Procedure MR with Post-Procedure CT After Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Park J; Lee JM; Lee DH; Joo I; Yoon JH; Park JY; Klotz E
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2017 Jun; 40(6):873-883. PubMed ID: 28091728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of Local Tumor Progression after Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Assessment of Ablative Margin Using Pre-RFA MRI and Post-RFA CT Registration.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Klotz E; Woo H; Yu MH; Joo I; Lee ES; Han JK
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(6):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 30386137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging evaluation of ablative margin and index tumor immediately after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison between multidetector-row CT and MR imaging.
    Kim SM; Shin SS; Lee BC; Kim JW; Heo SH; Lim HS; Jeong YY
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Oct; 42(10):2527-2537. PubMed ID: 28409202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of three-dimensional Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR fusion imaging with CT fusion imaging in the assessment of treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Makino Y; Imai Y; Igura T; Hori M; Fukuda K; Sawai Y; Kogita S; Fujita N; Takehara T; Murakami T
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 25052767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (> 2 and < 5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion.
    Kim YS; Lee WJ; Rhim H; Lim HK; Choi D; Lee JY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):758-65. PubMed ID: 20729457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimal ablative margin (MAM) assessment with image fusion: an independent predictor for local tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation.
    Laimer G; Schullian P; Jaschke N; Putzer D; Eberle G; Alzaga A; Odisio B; Bale R
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2463-2472. PubMed ID: 32002642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does hepatobiliary phase sequence qualitatively outperform unenhanced T1-weighted imaging in assessment of the ablation margin 24 hours after thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas?
    Takeyama N; Vidhyarkorn S; Chung DJ; Siripongsakun S; Kim HJ; Lu DS; Raman SS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Oct; 41(10):1942-55. PubMed ID: 27271219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fusion imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluating the early therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas with iso-echoic or unclear margins on conventional ultrasonography.
    Nishigori S; Numata K; Irie K; Fukuda H; Chuma M; Maeda S
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2018 Jul; 45(3):405-415. PubMed ID: 29362966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging with gadoxetic acid for local tumour progression after radiofrequency ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Kang TW; Rhim H; Lee J; Song KD; Lee MW; Kim YS; Lim HK; Jang KM; Kim SH; Gwak GY; Jung SH
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3437-46. PubMed ID: 26747262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-Dimensional Measurement of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ablation Zones and Margins for Predicting Local Tumor Progression.
    Hocquelet A; Trillaud H; Frulio N; Papadopoulos P; Balageas P; Salut C; Meyer M; Blanc JF; Montaudon M; Denis de Senneville B
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):1038-1045.e2. PubMed ID: 27156743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide.
    Fukuda K; Mori K; Hasegawa N; Nasu K; Ishige K; Okamoto Y; Shiigai M; Abei M; Minami M; Hyodo I
    Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):555-563. PubMed ID: 31102138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Percutaneous US/MRI Fusion-guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Subcentimeter Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Technical Feasibility and Therapeutic Outcomes.
    Song KD; Lee MW; Rhim H; Kang TW; Cha DI; Sinn DH; Lim HK
    Radiology; 2018 Sep; 288(3):878-886. PubMed ID: 29916771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound-ultrasound image overlay fusion improves real-time control of radiofrequency ablation margin in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Minami Y; Minami T; Hagiwara S; Ida H; Ueshima K; Nishida N; Murakami T; Kudo M
    Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1986-1993. PubMed ID: 29196855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3D fusion is superior to 2D point-to-point contrast-enhanced US to evaluate the ablative margin after RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Long H; Zhou X; Zhang X; Ye J; Huang T; Cong L; Xie X; Huang G
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):1247-1257. PubMed ID: 37572191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ablative safety margin depicted by fusion imaging with post-treatment contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pre-treatment CECT/CEMRI after radiofrequency ablation for liver cancers.
    Bo XW; Xu HX; Guo LH; Sun LP; Li XL; Zhao CK; He YP; Liu BJ; Li DD; Zhang K; Wang D
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 90(1078):20170063. PubMed ID: 28749166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of radiofrequency ablation margin by MRI-MRI image fusion in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Wang XL; Li K; Su ZZ; Huang ZP; Wang P; Zheng RQ
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(17):5345-51. PubMed ID: 25954109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical usefulness of the ablative margin assessed by magnetic resonance imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Okamoto T; Hodozuka M; Miyoshi K; Kishina M; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Sugihara T; Oyama K; Hosho K; Okano J; Murawaki Y; Kakite S; Yamashita E
    J Hepatol; 2015 Dec; 63(6):1360-7. PubMed ID: 26232269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of ablative margin by unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Miyoshi K; Kishina M; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Okamoto K; Murawaki Y; Kakite S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2730-6. PubMed ID: 22137612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of ablation margins based on registration of pre- and post-procedural MRI and distance map.
    Tani S; Tatli S; Hata N; Garcia-Rojas X; Olubiyi OI; Silverman SG; Tokuda J
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jun; 11(6):1133-42. PubMed ID: 27038962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.