These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3032787)
61. Shape memory effect on Ti-base Ti-V-Fe-Al alloys. Possibility to apply for dental implant. Kimura H; Sohmura T J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1985 Dec; 25():7-16. PubMed ID: 3914537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs. Karabuda C; Sandalli P; Yalcin S; Steflik DE; Parr GR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 10453665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Biointegrated hydroxylapatite-coated dental implants: 5-year clinical observations. Kent JN; Block MS; Finger IM; Guerra L; Larsen H; Misiek DJ J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jul; 121(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 2164542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Human histologic and histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated implants after 10 years of function: a case report. Trisi P; Keith DJ; Rocco S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 15747684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Surface analysis and effects on interfacial bone microhardness of collagen-coated titanium implants: a rabbit model. Morra M; Cassinelli C; Meda L; Fini M; Giavaresi G; Giardino R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 15747670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Relationship between surface characteristics and the degree of bone-implant integration. Thomas KA; Cook SD J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Jun; 26(6):831-3. PubMed ID: 1326561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Finite element analysis of bone-adapted and bone-bonded endosseous implants. Rieger MR; Adams WK; Kinzel GL; Brose MO J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):436-40. PubMed ID: 2685245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Strains in dog jaw bones following implant insertion: a photoelastic study. Kakudo Y; Ishida A; Yoshimoto S Implantologist; 1976 Oct; 1(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 1076323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Chemotherapeutic mouthrinses as adjuncts in implant dentistry. Meffert RM Am J Dent; 1989 Nov; 2 Spec No():317-21. PubMed ID: 2561665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Osseointegrated implants: five systems. The IMZ implant. Chapman RJ J Can Dent Assoc; 1989 Jun; 55(6):474-5. PubMed ID: 2670126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Interface histology of rigid endosseous implants. Roberts EW; Poon LC; Smith RK J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(3):406-16. PubMed ID: 3470526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Comparison of bone reactions to coated tricalcium phosphate and pure titanium dental implants in the canine iliac crest. Gerner BT; Barth E; Albrektsson T; Rönningen H; Solheim LF; Wie H Scand J Dent Res; 1988 Apr; 96(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 3281244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. The use of hydroxylapatite to coat subperiosteal implants. Golec TS J Oral Implantol; 1985; 12(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 2999414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Applications of hydroxylapatite in oral and maxillofacial surgery, part I: Periodontal and endosteal-implant repairs. Cranin AN; Tobin GP; Glebman J Compendium; 1987 Apr; 8(4):254-6, 258, 261-2. PubMed ID: 3032443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. A new implant design: a tripod with optimalisation of stress distribution on bone. II. Practical usage. Sweijd F Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 1979 Oct; 22(4):129-33. PubMed ID: 395979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Development of a new endosseous dental implant. Part I: Animal studies. Weiss MB; Rostoker W J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Dec; 46(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 7028978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]